Artin - domains don't seem to match

  • Thread starter Thread starter Whovian
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    domains Match
Whovian
Messages
651
Reaction score
3
This isn't a homework problem, but rather a bit of confusion regarding something in the textbook we're using; if this isn't the right place, feel free to move it.

From Artin's Algebra pages 422/423 (slightly paraphrased):

Let ##Q=\begin{bmatrix}1&\\3&1\end{bmatrix}##, ##A=\begin{bmatrix}2&-1\\1&2\end{bmatrix}##, ##P=\begin{bmatrix}1&1\\1&2\end{bmatrix}##, ##A'=Q^{-1}AP=\begin{bmatrix}1&\\&5\end{bmatrix}## (note: blank spaces are to be interpreted as zeroes.)

Let ##M## be the integer lattice with its standard basis ##{\bf C}=\left(e_1,e_2\right)##, and let ##L## be the lattice with basis ##{\bf B}=\left(v_1,v_2\right)=\left(\left(2,1\right)^t,\left(-1,2\right)^t\right)##. Its coordinate vectors are the columns of ##A##. We interpret ##P## as the matrix of a change of basis in ##L##, and ##Q## as the matrix of change of basis in ##M##.

My question is, if ##A## is interpreted as a map ##M\rightarrow L##, wouldn't we have to interpret ##P## as a map ##M\rightarrow M## and ##Q## as a map ##L\rightarrow L## to get ##A'##, which is just ##A## with different bases for ##M## and ##L##, to be ##M\rightarrow L##? Therefore ##P## would be interpreted as a change of basis in ##M## instead of ##L## and ##Q## in ##L## instead of ##M##? In fact, if we had set up the problem so ##A## was 2x3, ##Q## 2x2, and ##P## 3x3, ##M## would be ##\mathbb{R}^3## and ##L## would be ##\subseteq\mathbb{R}^2##, so ##P## could not be interpreted as a change of basis in ##L=\mathbb{R}^2## as it's 3x3.

Is there something incredibly obvious I'm missing?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ah, derp. There was something obvious. It turns out M is to be interpreted as the codomain of the free module homomorphism corresponding to A.
 
I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Back
Top