I Artinian Modules - Bland - Proposition 4.24

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter Math Amateur
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Modules
Math Amateur
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,920
Reaction score
48
I am reading Paul E. Bland's book, "Rings and Their Modules".

I am focused on Section 4.2: Noetherian and Artinian Modules and need some help to fully understand the proof of part of Proposition 4.2.4 ... ...

Proposition 4.2.4 reads as follows:
?temp_hash=05dde20a7081ba4eb52a559921ca1799.png

?temp_hash=05dde20a7081ba4eb52a559921ca1799.png


I need help to fully understand Part of the proof proving that ##(2) \Longrightarrow (3)## ...In that part of the proof Bland seems to be assuming that

## \bigcap_F M_\alpha = N ##

if and only if

## \bigcap_F (M_\alpha / N ) = 0 ##
In other words, if ##F = \{ 1, 2, 3 \}## then

##M_1 \cap M_2 \cap M_3##

if and only if

##M_1 / N \cap M_2 / N \cap M_3 / N## But why exactly is this the case ... ...

... ... how do we formally and rigorously demonstrate that this is true ...Hope someone can help ...

Peter
====================================================

Proposition 4.2.4 refers to the (possibly not well known) concept of cogeneration so I am providing Section 4.1 Generating as Cogenerating Classes ... ... as follows ...
?temp_hash=05dde20a7081ba4eb52a559921ca1799.png

?temp_hash=05dde20a7081ba4eb52a559921ca1799.png

?temp_hash=05dde20a7081ba4eb52a559921ca1799.png
 

Attachments

  • Bland - 1 - Proposition 4.2.4 - PART !.png
    Bland - 1 - Proposition 4.2.4 - PART !.png
    71.2 KB · Views: 779
  • Bland - 2 - Proposition 4.2.4 - PART 2.png
    Bland - 2 - Proposition 4.2.4 - PART 2.png
    31.1 KB · Views: 718
  • Bland -1 -  Section 4.1 - PART 1.png
    Bland -1 - Section 4.1 - PART 1.png
    36.1 KB · Views: 715
  • Bland  - 2 - Section 4.1 - PART 2.png
    Bland - 2 - Section 4.1 - PART 2.png
    43.2 KB · Views: 742
  • Bland  - 3 - Section 4.1 - PART 3.png
    Bland - 3 - Section 4.1 - PART 3.png
    45.4 KB · Views: 754
Physics news on Phys.org
Start by observing that
$$(\bigcap_{\alpha\in F} M_\alpha)/N=N/N$$
which is the zero element of the module ##M/N##.

So we have to show that
$$\bigcap_{\alpha\in F} (M_\alpha/N)=(\bigcap_{\alpha\in F} M_\alpha)/N\ \ \ \ \ \ \ (1)$$

First observe that if ##m\in \bigcap_{\alpha\in F} M_\alpha## then ##\forall\alpha\in F:\ m\in M_\alpha##
so that ##\forall\alpha\in F:\ m+N \in M_\alpha/N## whence
##m+N \in \bigcap_{\alpha\in F}M_\alpha/N##.

Hence we have
$$(\bigcap_{\alpha\in F} M_\alpha)/N\subseteq \bigcap_{\alpha\in F} (M_\alpha/N)$$

For the other direction of inclusion, consider an arbitrary element ##m+N## of the LHS of (1). That is, ##m+N\in \bigcap_{\alpha\in F} (M_\alpha/N)##. Then for any ##\alpha\in F## we have ##m+N\in M_\alpha/N##, so there exists ##m'\in M_\alpha## and ##n\in N## such that ##m=m'+n##, which is in ##M_\alpha## since ##n\in N\subseteq M_\alpha##. Hence ##m\in \bigcap_{\alpha\in F} M_\alpha## and therefore ##m+N## is an element of the RHS of (1).

This is not as elegant as I would like because it is late at night and I am tired. But hopefully it makes sense.
 
  • Like
Likes Math Amateur
Thanks for the help Andrew ... much appreciated...

Will be working through your post very shortly...

Thanks again ...

Peter
 
Thanks Andrew ... found that very clear and convincing ...

Peter
 
I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top