Asking the Prof to be a research assistant

  • Thread starter Thread starter Winzer
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Research
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the roles and expectations of assistants in academic settings, particularly in engineering and physics. Participants share their experiences as research assistants (RAs) and teaching assistants (TAs), highlighting the variety of tasks involved. Common responsibilities for RAs include conducting experiments, managing data, and engaging in programming projects, often with limited prior experience. Profs generally expect assistants to show up consistently, work diligently, and gradually improve their skills. The workload for TAs is often seen as a formality, with actual hours varying based on class demands and professor expectations. TAs typically handle grading, prepare solutions, and hold office hours, which can be a valuable learning experience. Overall, assistants are encouraged to be proactive, seek guidance, and develop their skills to contribute effectively to their professors' work.
Winzer
Messages
597
Reaction score
0
So for those of you whom are assistants for your prof what exactly do you do? I plan to really get to know my prof this summer (summer field session for engineering physics majors) and eventually offer my services that could be of use to him. They don't mind do they? But I am scared I may lack some abilities. That is why I would like examples of what exactly yu do as an assistant, thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Also, for the profs out there, what o you expect from your assistant?
Thanks again
 
I have been working (i.e. getting paid) for my prof since summer. First I worked at the physics lab, doing stuff like soldering, hooking up cables, taking sample data and measuring signal-to-noise ratios. Nothing fancy.

Last quarter and the one before that I worked on my professor's website for his project. Basically built it from the ground up. This quarter he gave me some code that calculates a form factor for the cavity in his particle detector (essentially how efficiently a particle can be detected depending on where it is in the cavity and at what frequency the cavity is at) and I need to figure out how it does it to make sure there's no errors in there, and then I have to update it with the parameters for the new cavity.

So it's interesting stuff for me. I had no experience in HTML when I started doing the website, rudimentary experience in electronics, and only a quarter of C++ before doing the coding project. He wasn't bothered by it.

Before that, I did independent research (for free) for a different prof and I worked on his muon detector thing that he was making. Unfortunately, we couldn't get the damn thing to work because of a leak, so I spent like over 2 months trying to fix that leak before I finally got the go-ahead to smother epoxy over it like I had originally suggested.

It wasn't nearly as interesting, but it was still pretty fun.
 
Sorry a bit off topic but still related to assistanship-related issue as a graduate student.
What is it like doing a 20 hrs/week teaching assistanship, is it relatively a heavy work load?
Is that 20 hrs/week relatively standard or below or above standard?
In reality, is that number of hours just for formality, that is, the actual number of hours a TA typically has to commit his/her duty can be much longer if not shorter than that?
I am supposing TA is much less preferrable than RA because with RA we don't have to follow the strict unpleasant hours of undergrad class schedule, do we?
I am hoping for comments particularly from those of you guys/ladies who have real experience of becoming a TA.

Thanks in advance.
 
Winzer,

Most profs expect you to show up, work hard, and be careful in the lab. They understand that your abilities are limited by your coursework and experience to date. In one research position, the prof gave me a programming task that was a bit beyond me. When I couldn't do it, he did it himself and gave me some simpler tasks without getting mad about it. Eventually my programming skills grew and I was able to complete the more complex programming tasks he gave me.

In an experimental lab, there are lots of mundane tasks, often involving vacuum systems or electronics. The profs don't mind showing you how to do stuff, but pay careful attention so that you don't have to be shown twice. Be willing to read the manual for equipment and use outside resources so that you don't take too much of the prof's time asking for repeated explanations.

You don't have to be a whiz at everything in the lab, but find a few things where you can really contribute. The bottom line for prof's regarding undergraduates helping in research is that the students are a net gain for the lab. You must save the prof and grad students more time and effort than they expend showing you stuff. You must show up regularly (on time), work hard, and grow in your abilities.

Be sure and take your prof's advice. If he wants you to take an electronics course or a programming course, do it.

I found a lot of mercy, kindness, and patience for my lack of abilities. But I worked very hard and tried to be dependable. Consequently, my undergraduate research was very fruitful, I was included as a co-author on two papers, I had good recommendations, and graduate schools were beating down my door.

Michael Courtney
 
Urkel said:
Sorry a bit off topic but still related to assistanship-related issue as a graduate student.
What is it like doing a 20 hrs/week teaching assistanship, is it relatively a heavy work load?
Is that 20 hrs/week relatively standard or below or above standard?
In reality, is that number of hours just for formality, that is, the actual number of hours a TA typically has to commit his/her duty can be much longer if not shorter than that?
I am supposing TA is much less preferrable than RA because with RA we don't have to follow the strict unpleasant hours of undergrad class schedule, do we?
I am hoping for comments particularly from those of you guys/ladies who have real experience of becoming a TA.

Thanks in advance.

In my experience, the number of hours is a formality, and the work load depends on the classes you are assigned and the profs teaching the classes. Only the prof can tell you exactly what your responsibilities are, but they usually include grading most (or all) of the student work, preparing solutions for homework, and perhaps setting some time aside (office hours) to help students with homework. I think I made a pretty good impression by writing up the solutions in LaTex for one course I TA'd.

I liked my RA because it got me into the research group where I completed my PhD research. However, I really learned a lot in my TA position because the prof was a great teacher and I used the opportunity to grow in my teaching skills by trying to understand the big picture of course design and delivery. The prof conveyed great enthusiasm for teaching physics and I was able to pick up on some of that.

Michael Courtney
 
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Back
Top