Associativity problem with observables

  • Thread starter Thread starter zetafunction
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    observables
zetafunction
Messages
371
Reaction score
0
let be A , B and C three non-commuting observables

my question is how can one solve the problem with associative property ? i mean

(AxB)xC will in general be different from Ax(BxC)

and if we had 4 A, B ,C ,D instead of three the problem is even worse , how can anyone deal with it ?? i mean since the observable do not commute and we can not apply the associative property is there any ambiguity in QM ?? or similar ??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Non-commutativity does not imply non-associativity, so I do not really see your problem here... (for example a non-Abelian group is still associative; the same goes for matrices).
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
923
Replies
18
Views
1K
Replies
33
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
414
Replies
3
Views
1K
Back
Top