Astronomy Logic and Accuracy: Check Your Homework with RQs and P3

  • Thread starter Thread starter ChrisEffinSmi
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Astronomy Logic
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on clarifying concepts related to apparent visual magnitude and celestial observations in astronomy. The term "apparent" in "apparent visual magnitude" highlights how a star's brightness is perceived from Earth, influenced by distance. Observers at the equator can theoretically see both celestial poles simultaneously due to atmospheric refraction, which raises stars near the horizon. The number of circumpolar constellations varies with latitude, as their visibility is contingent on the observer's position relative to the celestial poles. Changes in latitude also affect the angular distance between the zenith and celestial poles, impacting the observer's horizon.
ChrisEffinSmi
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
Working on a homework for a general astronomy class. Just want to make sure I'm not being inaccurate. Please let me know if I goofed something up. Thanks!

RQ7: The word “apparent” in “apparent visual magnitude” is used to denote its dependence on viewing distance. These numbers refer to the stars brightness as seen from Earth (flux). Therefore, a very distant yet very bright star might have a high apparent visual magnitude when seen from earth, but may appear much brighter from a closer vantage point.

RQ11: Theoretically, if you were to position yourself on the earth’s equator you could see both the north and south celestial poles at the same time.

RQ14: The number of circumpolar constellations depends on the latitude of the observer due to their very nature. A circumpolar constellation circles its respective celestial pole, and as such the further a person travels (changes in latitude) from the respective pole, the more perpendicular they are making themselves to that axis. Subsequently, constellations that never set when viewed from the pole will set and rise on a regular basis when viewed from the equator.

P3: Since the horizon remains perpendicular to the observer, as the observer changes latitude, the angular distance between the zenith and the celestial pole changes by the same amount. As such, a person at 35 degrees north of the equator will have a northern horizon that extends 35 degrees past the northern celestial pole. Also, the same person in the same position will have a southern horizon that terminates 35 degrees before the southern celestial pole.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
All of those descriptions are great. One interesting fact about RQ11: it might be practically possible to see both poles at the same time because atmospheric refraction makes stars near the horizon seem a degree higher than they actually are.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top