Astronomy Physics - Apparent Magnitudes

Rahzizzle
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The WIYN 3.5m telescope has a multi-object spectrograph called “Hydra.” The instrument has 100 independently deployable fibers that can be placed anywhere over a 1 degree field of view (FoV). Assume the FoV is a circle one degree in diameter. You can get a spectrum through each fiber, but the spectrograph will only allow you to look at 100nm at a time (e.g. 400nm-500nm). Assume you have detected a cluster of galaxies at a redshift of z~0.01. Your initial estimate is that the cluster spans a bit less than one degree on the sky.

Question : In order to carry out some observations you’ll first want to predict what the apparent magnitudes of the three brightest galaxies to be. You also need to predict how many galaxies you expect to see that are 3 magnitudes fainter than the brightest galaxy in the cluster.


I have absolutely no idea where to start, this is a weird question.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Its a bit ambiguously worded, you really don't know what the 3 brightest members of cluster are until you look at it, but. . .

Part A: Well, what is the relationship between the apparent and absolute magnitudes of objects. What types of galaxies are usually the brightest members of a cluster? Aside from the brightest members of a cluster, what are the next brightest types of galaxies in general? I

Part B: What is the distribution of galaxy luminosities? I.E. google "galaxy luminosity function" or look it up in your book. Its not a gaussian at all, but for example, if it were, then how could you calculate the number of galaxies between say m=18 and m=20 if it was a gaussian distribution centered at m=17 and \sigma=1 mag?
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top