Astrophysics -What actually is this?

  • Thread starter Thread starter !Live_4Ever!
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Astrophysics
AI Thread Summary
Astrophysics is a branch of astronomy that emphasizes theoretical understanding of celestial phenomena, while astronomy traditionally focused on observation and cataloging. The distinction between the two fields has blurred, with most modern astronomers also being considered astrophysicists due to their reliance on physics to explain cosmic events like the Big Bang and stellar behavior. Quantum physics plays a crucial role in astrophysics, helping to describe various phenomena, including star formation and supernovae. Historically, astronomy was limited to classical mechanics until advancements in relativity and quantum mechanics expanded the field significantly. Overall, both disciplines are interconnected, with astrophysics representing a more theoretical approach to understanding the universe.
!Live_4Ever!
Messages
45
Reaction score
0
I was wonderiong what actually this field is, is it Astronomy with more math and physics? Or is it relevant to the Big Bang and Quantum physics?

Just wondering
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
The distinction between astrophysics and astronomy is sort of a matter of taste. Astronomy was originally more concerned with observation, while astrophysics has its emphasis on theory. Big bang is a phenomenom, where the theory is astrophysics and the observational evidence (cosmic microwave background, etc.) is astronomy. Quantum physics is a branch of physics used by astrophysicists in describing many differenent phenomena, such as how stars shine to supernova events as well as the big bang.
 
I was going to say that just off the top of my head I'd say that astronomy is the science of merely recording celestial observations and cataloging objects, while astrophysics is the study of what those objects are, what they are made of, and how they behave.

I would go further to say that virtually all astronomers today are astrophysicists as well. Even Dr. Margaret Geller who has focused on the study of mapping the large scale structure of the universe is considered to be an astrophysicist rather than just an astronomer. Of course, she is also deeply involved with considering physical explanations of what might have caused the discovered structure to have evolved.

Just for fun I Googled "Astronomy vs. Astrophysics" and found a short article from Penn State that supports my personal take on these definitions.

http://www.pserie.psu.edu/academic/science/degrees/astronomy/astrophysics.htm"

From that ariticle:
Today, everyone who practices astronomy professionally is considered to be an astrophysicist, and typically has an undergraduate background in physics or a related discipline.
So in a sense you could say that today there really isn't any difference between the two words, but historically astronomy was concerned more with just mapping and cataloging observations.

Just for kicks here's a link to a site that talks about Geller's work in mapping the universe. She is a true Astronomer/Astrophysicist. :approve:

[url=" http://www.realtruthmag.org/articles/july-mtu.html]Mapping the Universe[/url]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Astronomy is the all-encompassing term. Astrophysics is one aspect of astronomy. Other categories can include cosmology, planetary science, observational astronomy, etc. etc. And there's overlap among the categories.
 
Good question, and unfortunately I don't think a definitive answer exists. It's funny the difference in reaction I get when I tell people I'm an "astronomer" vs. telling them I'm an "astrophysicist". The latter usually stops the conversation.
 
Pretty much anything physics ends a conversation, unless its another physicist.

Probably before 1900, astronomy was pretty much observation and the theory was confined to classical mechanics. With observation one builds models and confirms theories.

With the advent of relativity, nuclear/particle physics and quantum mechanics, the field of astronomy/astrophysics exploded. Now one could begin to understand stars on a different level. Then new phenomena like quasars were discovered. Then black holes . . . .
 
Astronuc said:
Pretty much anything physics ends a conversation, unless its another physicist.

Probably before 1900, astronomy was pretty much observation and the theory was confined to classical mechanics. With observation one builds models and confirms theories.

With the advent of relativity, nuclear/particle physics and quantum mechanics, the field of astronomy/astrophysics exploded. Now one could begin to understand stars on a different level. Then new phenomena like quasars were discovered. Then black holes . . . .


Isn't relativity part of classical mechanics? :confused:

Sorry if i am too skeptical..
 
Bladibla said:
Isn't relativity part of classical mechanics? :confused:

Sorry if i am too skeptical..

Classical mechanics is Newton's mechanics.

Anyway, they sometimes say you need a good telescope to be a good astronomer and good mathematical skills to be an astrophysicist :wink:
 

Similar threads

Back
Top