Asymetric graph with three nods

  • Thread starter Thread starter Tom83B
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Graph
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the asymmetry of a specific graph configuration with three nodes. It questions why the graph is not considered asymmetric, noting that there appears to be only one automorphism present. The conclusion reached is that the graph cannot be asymmetric due to the existence of non-trivial symmetries, specifically the permutation (1 2). This realization clarifies the initial confusion regarding the graph's properties. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding graph symmetries in determining asymmetry.
Tom83B
Messages
45
Reaction score
0
Why isn't this graph:
1-2 3
asymetric?
I think there exists only one automorphism:
2-1 3
but I'm also supposed to prove that ther are no asymetric graphs with 1<|V(G)|<=5
so it can't be assymetric
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Oh I see now! It can have no non-trivial symmetries and permutation (1 2) is already a non-trivial symmetry.
Sorry to bother
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top