At what distance does a seaplane's boundary layer transition to turbulence?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the distance from the leading edge of a seaplane's fuselage where the boundary layer transitions to turbulence, using the Reynolds number. The user attempts to determine this distance by setting the Reynolds number to 500,000 for turbulent flow and solving for the characteristic length L. They calculate L to be approximately 0.511 feet using viscosity and density values for air at 45°F, but find a discrepancy with a textbook answer of 0.295 feet. The user seeks clarification on their calculations and whether any assumptions may have been overlooked. The thread highlights the importance of accurate calculations and assumptions in fluid dynamics.
Brian T
Messages
130
Reaction score
31

Homework Statement


A seaplane flies at 100 mph through air at 45 *F. At what distance from the leading edge of the underside of the fuselage does the boundary layer transition to turbulence?

Homework Equations


Re = pvL/u
Re is Reynolds number
p (rho) is the density
V is the characteristic velocity
L is the characteristic length
u (mu) is the viscosity

The Attempt at a Solution


For turbulent flow (as said by my prof and the book), Re > 500000. So to find out when it transitions to turbulence, set Re to 500000 and solve for the characteric length L.

Solving for L, L = (Re)(u)/(p)(v)

From the appendix, the viscosity of air at 45*F is u = 3.66 x 10^-7 (lbf) (s) /ft^2 and p =. 00245 slug/ft^3. V is 100 mph which becomes 146.666 ft/s. Plugging these in, and Re = 500000, I get am answer of .511 ft.

The book, however, says the answer is. 295 ft. Can anyone help me out? I believe the calculation is correct as I ran it several times, but is there something I'm doing wrong or an assumption I'm missing? Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Please show us the calculation, including the manipulation of the units.

Chet
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top