At what velocity does the skateboard shoot off?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the velocity of a skateboard after a person jumps off at 3 m/s. The initial calculation yielded a skateboard velocity of 42.857 m/s, which raises questions about the assumptions made regarding the jump's reference frame. Participants note that the jump speed may be relative to the skateboard rather than the ground, complicating the scenario. Additionally, the feasibility of achieving such a high velocity in a short time frame is questioned, with calculations suggesting unrealistic forces and accelerations required. Ultimately, it is concluded that the jump speed is likely relative to the skateboard, leading to more reasonable results.
cody7688
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
A person stands still on skateboard. He then jumps off at a velocity of 3 m/s. His mass is 50 kg and the skateboard has a mass of 3.5 kg. At what velocity does the skateboard shoot off?2. Is my answer correct?
If not what did I do wrong?3. m1v1=m2v2
V= 42.857 m/s
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
cody7688 said:
A person stands still on skateboard. He then jumps off at a velocity of 3 m/s. His mass is 50 kg and the skateboard has a mass of 3.5 kg. At what velocity does the skateboard shoot off?2. Is my answer correct?
If not what did I do wrong?
3. m1v1=m2v2
V= 42.857 m/s
Unfortunately the question does not make clear whether the 3m/s is relative to the ground (as you have assumed) or relative to the skateboard.
(In fact, it is not even clear whether the jump is in the fore-aft direction of the skateboard!)
 
Hello Cody, welcome to PF :smile: !

I see your post was edited by a moderator; I wonder what was changed ?!

If you make the assumption Haru mentions, you end up with the result you obtained. It is worth checking if that is realistic (even if exercise composers and reallity are rather often at odds...)

3 m/s is 10.8 km/h, so modest running speed. It's difficult to give yourself that speed in a fraction of a second even when on solid ground, let alone when on a skateboard !
Assume you have 0.1 sec to push off (by then the skateboard is well under way - as we will see).
That requires an acceleration of 430 m/s2 and a force of 430 * 3.5 = 1500 N. Three times body weight !
And in 0.1 s, the board is ½ * 430 * 0.12 = 2.14 m away. More than 2 leg lengths. So even the 0.1 is too long !

Shorter legs ? 0.03 s pushing time (to get the 2.14 m down to 0.64 m) requires 5000 N, ten times body weight. No way !

(All these calculations are rough: assuming constant acceleration gives reasonable estimates, though)
--

My conclusion: the 3 m/s is wrt the board. Less sensational, I agree.
I do get reasonable numbers.
Anyone beg to differ ?

--
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top