Atomic Physics: Finding Energy Levels

i_wish_i_was_smart
Messages
91
Reaction score
1
i am having problems with the atom model part of physics, i know that the current model stats the electron location is a probability and all, its when i get to the wavelength and the energy, with all the ionization and the spectrums that i don't understand...

how can i find the energy level with a spectrum, do i use E=mc2 or E=pc by finding p with p=h/wavelength... or do i use more of a atomic physics equation like E=hf=hc/wavelength

keep in mind that i am french and i don't fully understand english termanlogy thx
 
Physics news on Phys.org
i_wish_i_was_smart said:
i am having problems with the atom model part of physics, i know that the current model stats the electron location is a probability and all, its when i get to the wavelength and the energy, with all the ionization and the spectrums that i don't understand...

how can i find the energy level with a spectrum, do i use E=mc2 or E=pc by finding p with p=h/wavelength... or do i use more of a atomic physics equation like E=hf=hc/wavelength

You find the energy level of an atom by solving the Schrodinger Equation for that atom (something you can only do exactly for H-atom). Then you find the energy eigenvalues using that solution and voila! You have the energy level spectrum!

... assuming, of course, that "Schrodinger Equation" translates to roughly the same thing in french.

Zz.
 
(Zapper,
I doubt that the poster knows what a wave function is, far less know what solutions to the Schrodinger Equation look like or what spherical harmonics are. )

I'm only guessing your level, but I suggest you use the Bohr model to find energy levels and wavelengths of absorption/emission spectra. They are very good for a first approximation. Use E = hf, to convert between energy and frequency (or wavelength).

There's good info at wolfram : http://scienceworld.wolfram.com/physics/BalmerFormula.html
 
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...
Back
Top