Atoms & Sound Waves: Science vs Religion

AI Thread Summary
Atoms are fundamental units of matter composed of protons, neutrons, and electrons, but they are not made of sound waves. While electrons exhibit wave-like behavior, particularly as standing waves, this does not equate to atoms being composed of sound waves. The discussion highlights a common misconception about the relationship between atomic structure and sound. Clarifying the distinction between atomic particles and wave behavior is crucial in understanding the science behind matter. The argument emphasizes the importance of accurate scientific interpretation in discussions involving science and religion.
letarose
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
In an argument of sorts with another college classmate, please help. We were argueing science and religion. She stated that all life is made up of atoms, and atoms are now shown to be made up of soundwaves also. Not possible correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Atoms are not made of SOUND waves, but electrons in atoms and molecules behave like STANDING waves.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top