Atronuc quote - Getting right answer

  • Thread starter Thread starter rcgldr
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Quote
AI Thread Summary
The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding problem-solving processes rather than just obtaining the correct answers. It highlights the limitations of autistic savants, who may achieve the right answers without comprehending the underlying methods, thus lacking broader knowledge and social skills. The conversation critiques reliance on calculators and pre-programmed algorithms in education, arguing that true understanding comes from manual problem-solving, which fosters the ability to tackle more complex challenges. The value of learning the reasoning behind solutions is stressed, as it enables the application of various methods to unique problems, contrasting with merely being a tool for computation.
rcgldr
Homework Helper
Messages
8,917
Reaction score
672
Astronuc said:
Getting the 'right' answer is important, but understanding how to solve the problem (i.e. how you get the right answer) is just as important, if not more so.
What about a Savant? They don't understand themselves how they get the "right" answer.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think that's why they study savants so much--it's sort of like the two-slit experiment.
 
Jeff Reid said:
What about a Savant? They don't understand themselves how they get the "right" answer.
I presume one is referring to an 'autisitic savant' as a opposed to a learned person, well versed in literature or science as well as the fine arts, often with an exceptional skill in a specialized field of learning.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Savant
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Autistic_savant

Autisitic (or perjorativley, idiot) savant - 1 : a person affected with a mental disability (as autism or mental retardation) who exhibits exceptional skill or brilliance in some limited field (as mathematics or music) —called also savant.
2 : a person who is highly knowledgeable about one subject but knows little about anything else.

The second definition indicates the limitations of those with autistic savant syndrome. They may know in a factual sense but have limited understanding, and quite often know or understand little outside of a limited knowledge base. I believe that in general, savants have poor social skills.

As rewebster indicated, autisitic savants are studied to better understand the brain (or cerebral cortical) structure to understand how and why they function.

My statement was intended to emphasize the learning of how and why as opposed to simply substituting (plugging in) numbers for variables and getting an answer. I was reflecting on some comments and apparent expectations in the Homework forums.
 
Jeff Reid said:
What about a Savant? They don't understand themselves how they get the "right" answer.

These savants can get the "right answer," but they need to constantly be told what the "questions" are.

Understanding how you get the right answer allows you to take the next step and solve more difficult problems that require variations in the solution method; and then to synthesize several methods of solutions into unique applications.

Otherwise, you are just an extension of your calculator.
 
Last edited:
Give the person a fish...blah blah blah.
 
In fact, while studying science or engineering, the answer itself often counts for very little compared to the work needed to get the answer.

I don't know what it's like in college today, but my professors would often design tests so that a calculator either wouldn't be of use, or in a few rare cases a calculator could even prevent you from getting the right answer. I remember acing out the rest of the class at the end of my lower div physics courses this way. Only by working the problem by hand did one see that approximations could be used several times to arrive at the correct solution. Those using pre-programmed algorithms trailed off into never-never land and got stuck.
 
Similar to the 2024 thread, here I start the 2025 thread. As always it is getting increasingly difficult to predict, so I will make a list based on other article predictions. You can also leave your prediction here. Here are the predictions of 2024 that did not make it: Peter Shor, David Deutsch and all the rest of the quantum computing community (various sources) Pablo Jarrillo Herrero, Allan McDonald and Rafi Bistritzer for magic angle in twisted graphene (various sources) Christoph...
Thread 'My experience as a hostage'
I believe it was the summer of 2001 that I made a trip to Peru for my work. I was a private contractor doing automation engineering and programming for various companies, including Frito Lay. Frito had purchased a snack food plant near Lima, Peru, and sent me down to oversee the upgrades to the systems and the startup. Peru was still suffering the ills of a recent civil war and I knew it was dicey, but the money was too good to pass up. It was a long trip to Lima; about 14 hours of airtime...
Back
Top