Attractive Forces: Delta V, E', and E0 Explained

  • Thread starter Thread starter Niles
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Forces
Niles
Messages
1,834
Reaction score
0
Hi

The unperturbed energy of the ground state a quantum system is denoted E0. Now the perturbed energy of the ground state of the same quantum system is denoted E'.

If we have that delta V = E' - E0<0, then my book says that the perturbation is an attractive force.

Why is that?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It depends on how exactly "force" is defined. Suppose the strength of the perturbation is controlled by a physical degree of freedom. E.g. consider two atoms at some distance d, and take the perturbation to be the electrostatic interaction between the two atoms. If d is infinite you have the unperturbed Hamiltonian, and the smaller you make d, the larger the perturbation becomes. If the perturbation to the energy is negative, then that means that the total energy of the atoms held at rest would become less if you were to move them closer.

If the atoms can move freely, then due to conservation of energy their kinetic eergy would have to increase. So, the "total energy at rest" gives you the effective potential energy and minus the gradient of that is the force.
 
It arises when looking at two neutral, polarizable atoms. Here we show that the perturbation (the Coulomb interaction between the atoms) causes an attractive potential proportional to the inverse sixth power of their separation.

This is the van der Waals interaction.

What I cannot understand is, why delta V = E - E0 (see first post) implies an attractive force.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
I asked a question related to a table levitating but I am going to try to be specific about my question after one of the forum mentors stated I should make my question more specific (although I'm still not sure why one couldn't have asked if a table levitating is possible according to physics). Specifically, I am interested in knowing how much justification we have for an extreme low probability thermal fluctuation that results in a "miraculous" event compared to, say, a dice roll. Does a...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Back
Top