Atwood's Machine with unknown masses

  • Thread starter Thread starter Warmacblu
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Machine
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around an Atwood's machine problem involving two unknown masses, where participants analyze the relationship between acceleration, kinetic energy, and the masses based on given conditions. The original poster presents calculations and equations related to the system's dynamics, seeking to determine the values of the heavier and lighter masses.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants examine the algebraic steps taken to relate the masses and question the correctness of specific calculations, particularly regarding the manipulation of equations involving mass and acceleration. There are discussions about combining terms and the implications of different algebraic approaches.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with participants providing hints and guidance on algebraic manipulation and equation setup. There is an active exploration of different interpretations of the equations, and while some participants express uncertainty about their calculations, others offer clarifications and suggestions for resolving discrepancies.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the constraints of a homework assignment, which may limit the information available for solving the problem. There are indications of confusion regarding the application of certain equations and the relationships between the variables involved.

Warmacblu
Messages
103
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A simple Atwood's machine uses two masses m1 and m2. Starting from rest, the speed of the two masses is 8.7 m/s at the end of 7.4 s. At that time, the kinetic energy of the system is 61 J and each mass has moved a distance of 32.19 m.

Find the value of the heavier mass.

Find the value of the lighter mass.

Homework Equations



a = (m2 - m1) / (m1 + m2)g
Ke = 1/2mv2

The Attempt at a Solution



61 = 1/2m1v2 + 1/2m2v2
61 = 1/2(8.7)2(m1+m2)
61 = 37.845(m1+m2)
m1+m2 = 1.612

a = 8.7 / 7.4 = 1.176

1.176 = (m2 - m1) / (m1 + m2)g
10.976m1 = 8.624m2
m1 = .786m2

.786m2 + m2 = 1.612
2m2 = 2.051
m2 = 1.025

m1 + 1.025 = 1.612
m1 = .587

I was sure that I solved it correctly, perhaps my algebra for solving the acceleration equation is incorrect.

Thanks for any help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
.786m2 + m2 = 1.612
2m2 = 2.051
-------> Shouldn't this be 1.786m2=1.612?
 
method_man said:
-------> Shouldn't this be 1.786m2=1.612?

So you are saying my algebra for solving the acceleration equation is wrong? I got .786, not 1.786.
 
Warmacblu said:
So you are saying my algebra for solving the acceleration equation is wrong? I got .786, not 1.786.
It seems to me so.
0.786m2 + m2 = 1.612
(0.786+1)m2=1.612
1.786m2=1.612
Could you write down exact solution?
 
I got .786 from this:

1.176 = (m2 - m1) / (m1 + m2)g
10.976m1 = 8.624m2
m1 = .786m2
 
the problem is: how do you get from

[tex].786m_2 + m_2= 1.612[/tex]

to

[tex]2m_2 = 2.051[/tex]
 
[tex]1.176 = \frac {m_2 - m_1} {m_1 + m_2} g[/tex]

[tex]10.976m_1 = 8.624m_2[/tex]

this step is also wrong
 
Last edited:
willem2 said:
the problem is: how do you get from

[tex].786m_2 + m_2= 1.612[/tex]

to

[tex]2m_2 = 2.051[/tex]

I divided 1.612 by .786 then I thought I could combine like terms.

willem2 said:
[tex]1.176 = \frac {m_2 - m_1} {m_1 + m_2} g[/tex]

[tex]10.976m_1 = 8.624m_2[/tex]

this step is also wrong

I was kinda finicky on this step. Could you give me a hint on how to solve it algebraically?
 
Warmacblu said:
I divided 1.612 by .786 then I thought I could combine like terms.

you have to divide ALL terms by .786. THat would give you [itex]m_2 + m_2/0.786 = 1.612/0.786[/itex] I don't think that helps.

I was kinda finicky on this step. Could you give me a hint on how to solve it algebraically?

[/QUOTE]

multiply both sides by [itex]\frac {m_1 + m_2} {g}[/itex] (you already know what m_1+m_2 is)

combine what you get with [itex]m_1 + m_2 = 1.612[/itex]
 
  • #10
willem2 said:
you have to divide ALL terms by .786. THat would give you [itex]m_2 + m_2/0.786 = 1.612/0.786[/itex] I don't think that helps.

multiply both sides by [itex]\frac {m_1 + m_2} {g}[/itex] (you already know what m_1+m_2 is)

combine what you get with [itex]m_1 + m_2 = 1.612[/itex][/QUOTE]

Okay, so I did this:

1.176 = (m2 - m1) / (m1 + m2) g
1.176 (m1 + m2) g = m2 - m1
1.176 (15.7976) = m2 - m1
18.578 = m2 - m1

I don't know if this is correct because I multiplied m1 + m2 and g. I wasn't sure if I should divide by g or multiply since it is in the denominator.
 
  • #11
Warmacblu said:
multiply both sides by [itex]\frac {m_1 + m_2} {g}[/itex] (you already know what m_1+m_2 is)

combine what you get with [itex]m_1 + m_2 = 1.612[/itex]

Okay, so I did this:

1.176 = (m2 - m1) / (m1 + m2) g
[/QUOTE]

note that it's [tex]a = \frac {m_2 - m_1} {m_1 + m_2} g[/tex]

not

[tex]a = \frac {m_2 - m_1} {(m_1 + m_2) g}[/tex]

so you have to multiply both sides by m_1 + m_2 and then divide by g
 
  • #12
willem2 said:
Okay, so I did this:

1.176 = (m2 - m1) / (m1 + m2) g

note that it's [tex]a = \frac {m_2 - m_1} {m_1 + m_2} g[/tex]

not

[tex]a = \frac {m_2 - m_1} {(m_1 + m_2) g}[/tex]

so you have to multiply both sides by m_1 + m_2 and then divide by g

Okay, here's what I came up with.

1.176 = ((m2 - m1) / (m1 + m2))g

(1.176 * 1.162) / g = .19344 = m2 - m1

How does that look? I do not know what you mean when you say add it to m1 + m2 = 1.612.

Thanks for the help.
 
  • #13
adding 2 equations:

if you have A = B and C=D then A+C = B+D

now you have .19344 = m2 - m1

and m1 + m2 = 1.162
 
  • #14
willem2 said:
adding 2 equations:

if you have A = B and C=D then A+C = B+D

now you have .19344 = m2 - m1

and m1 + m2 = 1.162

A = .19344
B = m2 - m1
C = 1.162
D = m1 + m2

.19344 + 1.162 = (m2 - m1) + (m1 + m2)

How does that set-up look?
 
  • #15
Looks OK. you can now add up the right and the left side of this equation.
 
  • #16
willem2 said:
Looks OK. you can now add up the right and the left side of this equation.

.19344 + 1.162 = (m2 - m1) + (m1 + m2)

1.35544 = m2 + m1

m1 = m2 - 1.35544


Using the equation from Ke and Pe:

m1 + m2 = 1.612

m2 - 1.35544 + m2 = 1.612

m2 + m2 = 2.96744

2m2 = 2.96744

m2 = 1.48372

So m1:

m1 + 1.48372 = 1.612

m1 = .12828

Is my math okay?
 
  • #17
Warmacblu said:
.19344 + 1.162 = (m2 - m1) + (m1 + m2)

1.35544 = m2 + m1

m1 = m2 - 1.35544

the only reason for adding the 2 equations was that m1 would disappear.

m1 - m2 + m1 + m2 = ?



if you have 2 equations like 2x - y = 7 and 3x + y = 4 it's often easy to eliminate one
of the variables by adding or subtracting them.
if you add them you get 2x - y + 3x + y = 7 + 4 so you get 5x = 11 and x = 11/5

then you substitute x = 11/5 in 2x - y = 7 to get y: 2 (11/5) - y = 7 => y = 22/5 -7 = 22/5 - 35/5 = - 13/5 = -2.6

adding the equations works because y appears in one of them and -y in the other, so you
know y will disappear.
 
  • #18
I understand now, thanks. I also went to my professor to discuss this question and he explained an easier way to do it, but similar.

Thanks for all the help.
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 97 ·
4
Replies
97
Views
17K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
7K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K