MHB Calculating Average Acceleration for Changing Velocity and Direction

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the average acceleration of a car that first moves north at 50 mph and then turns 45 degrees east at 55 mph. The initial and final velocities are analyzed in both x and y components, with the average acceleration calculated as a change in velocity over time. The initial calculations yielded average accelerations of 389 mph/h for the x component and -161 mph/h for the y component, but adjustments were made after realizing the correct initial velocity for the y component should be 50 mph. Ultimately, the corrected average acceleration is approximately (388.9, 111.1) mph/h, confirming the method's validity.
ognik
Messages
626
Reaction score
2
I would just appreciate someone checking this please, I'm not sure of my answer ...

Q: Car moves North with constant speed 50 mph for 5 mins. It then turns 45 degree east and continues at 55 mph for 1 min. Find ave. acceleration.

For x, y components, Cos45 = Sin45 = 0.7, so for the 2nd part $v_x = v_y = 55 \times 0.7 = 38.9 $ mph for 1 min

So, $ a_x (ave) = \frac{\Delta v_x}{\Delta t} = \frac{38.9 - 0}{5 + 1}(60) = 389 $ and $ a_y (ave) = \frac{\Delta v_y}{\Delta t} = \frac{38.9 - 55}{5 + 1}(60) = -161 $ ?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
ognik said:
I would just appreciate someone checking this please, I'm not sure of my answer ...

Q: Car moves North with constant speed 50 mph for 5 mins. It then turns 45 degree east and continues at 55 mph for 1 min. Find ave. acceleration.

For x, y components, Cos45 = Sin45 = 0.7, so for the 2nd part $v_x = v_y = 55 \times 0.7 = 38.9 $ mph for 1 min

So, $ a_x (ave) = \frac{\Delta v_x}{\Delta t} = \frac{38.9 - 0}{5 + 1}(60) = 389 $ and $ a_y (ave) = \frac{\Delta v_y}{\Delta t} = \frac{38.9 - 55}{5 + 1}(60) = -161 $ ?

What units do you think your average acceleration has?

.
 
Hi - was not really worrying about getting the units strictly correct, just wanted to make sure I understood how to apply the average in this situation (where to me the average acceleration seems a bit meaningless)... but the units should be mph ph or $\frac{miles}{hour^2}$
 
Average acceleration is change in velocity divided by the time. Here the initial velocity is $v_0=(0,50)$ and the final velocity is $v_1=(38.89,38.89)$ in units of mph, and the time interval is $6$ minutes or $1/10$ hours.

So the average acceleration is:
$$
\overline{a}=\frac{(38.89,38.89)-(0,50)}{1/10}=10(38.89,-11.11)=(388.9,111.1) \mbox{ mph/h}
$$
 
So my method seems ok thanks (I noticed I used 55 instead of 50 for the y component).
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top