Average Array: Limit of Average Terms?

  • Thread starter Thread starter kishtik
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Array Average
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the concept of determining the limit of an array's average as the number of terms approaches infinity. Participants clarify that "array" refers to a list of numbers and "average" typically means the arithmetic mean. However, there is confusion regarding the definition of "limit" in this context, particularly what variable is being considered as it approaches infinity. The conversation emphasizes the need for precise definitions to understand the mathematical implications fully. Ultimately, the limit of an array's average can be analyzed as the number of terms increases indefinitely.
kishtik
Messages
96
Reaction score
0
Is limit of an array average of its terms?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
This is incomprehensible; what do you mean by the term "limit", is "average" arithmetic average, is "array" meant to denote an array of numbers like a vector or matrix?
 
I would be willing to assume that "array" means just a list of numbers and that "average" is the mean or arithmetic average but I still have no idea what you mean by the "limit" of an array. The limit as what variable goes to what?
 
Sorry!
Suppose (an)=(a1, a2, ..., an) is a function from N+ to R ("array"), "average" can be both arithmetic and geometric, "limit" is the limit of this function while n->infinity.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top