Average Speed Vs. Direct Average?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the distinction between average speed in physics and a traditional average. Average speed is defined as total distance divided by total time, resulting in a time-weighted average, while a traditional average simply sums values and divides by the count. An example illustrates that a car traveling different distances at different speeds yields an overall average speed of 60 km/hr, contrasting with a direct average of 65 km/hr. Participants emphasize the need for clarity in definitions, especially for newcomers to physics. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding these concepts for better comprehension of physics fundamentals.
Simon777
Messages
35
Reaction score
0
I'm having trouble differentiating between the definition of average in physics and a traditional average.

For example, say a car travels 100km for 2 hours then travels 80km for 1 hour. The average speed for the first portion is 50km/hr and the average speed for the second portion is 80km/hr.

Here is where I have an issue. The average speed for the entire trip is 60km/hr(total distance over total time), but taking a traditional direct average where you add everything and divide by the sum of how many things you added together, I get 65km/hr. Why are these different? If anyone can define these two types of averages for me, I'd greatly appreciate it.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Simon777 said:
I'm having trouble differentiating between the definition of average in physics and a traditional average.

For example, say a car travels 100km for 2 hours then travels 80km for 1 hour. The average speed for the first portion is 50km/hr and the average speed for the second portion is 80km/hr.

Here is where I have an issue. The average speed for the entire trip is 60km/hr(total distance over total time), but taking a traditional direct average where you add everything and divide by the sum of how many things you added together, I get 65km/hr. Why are these different? If anyone can define these two types of averages for me, I'd greatly appreciate it.

We define average speed as v= Total distance /time.It is a physical definition that can be a useful in some situations.We can also define Vav as the average of a set of speeds. This is a statistical definition and can be useful is some situation.For example If we want to find the average velocity of a bullet coming out of a gun we make multiple measurements of that velocity and average it.They are totally different concepts.
 
Thank you both, these two concepts make sense to me now. To further solidify this in my mind, could either of you state a situation where the physical definition of average speed is useful?

I like the example for the statistical definition of an average with finding an average velocity of a bullet and will remember that, but now I need an example for the physical definition to help visualize these concepts.
 
Suppose you had to make the trip where you
"travels 100km for 2 hours then travels 80km for 1 hour".
(You worked out the velocities on each leg.)

Could you make the same trip (with same starting and ending positions in the same total time)
with a constant velocity? If so, what is that velocity?

It might help if you draw a position-vs-time graph.
 
robphy said:
Suppose you had to make the trip where you
"travels 100km for 2 hours then travels 80km for 1 hour".
(You worked out the velocities on each leg.)

Could you make the same trip (with same starting and ending positions in the same total time)
with a constant velocity? If so, what is that velocity?

It might help if you draw a position-vs-time graph.

That's a really good one, thank you. This is my first physics class in college and so far the book has done a good job of explaining the fundamentals, but I agree with you that physics books need to clearly state if there is a different definition for something like average since newcomers like me are used to the traditional definition. Regardless, I'm still enjoying the subject and will keep at it. Thank you for helping me.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top