Avoiding A Crash Course In Planetary Defense

AI Thread Summary
The discussion emphasizes the potential threat posed by asteroids and comets to Earth, highlighting that while large impacts are rare, smaller asteroids are more numerous and can cause localized damage. The Planetary Defense Conference addressed various strategies for planetary defense, including techniques for deflecting or neutralizing these threats. Participants explored innovative methods ranging from gentle nudging to more aggressive nuclear options. The conversation also referenced a recent close approach of an asteroid, underscoring the ongoing need for vigilance and preparedness. Overall, the importance of developing effective planetary defense mechanisms is critical for safeguarding Earth from cosmic hazards.
Ivan Seeking
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
8,194
Reaction score
2,458
Avoiding A “Crash Course” In Planetary Defense

GARDEN GROVE, California – There is certainty in the thought that an asteroid or comet loitering in deep space has Earth’s name on it. While a civilization-snuffing impact is a low probability, it is not zero.

But there are other trouble-makers out there too. They are the smaller asteroids, and far more numerous. They too could mess up the day, but in a more localized way.

The technologies and techniques to defend Earth from such malicious cosmic interlopers were tackled at The Planetary Defense Conference: Protecting Earth from Asteroids held here February 23-26, and sponsored by The Aerospace Corporation and the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA).

How best to deflect or defeat nature’s own terrorist attack on our own planetary turf conjures up all kinds of thinking -- from nudging to nuking objects that have Earth in their cross-hairs. [continued]

http://www.space.com/businesstechnology/technology/neo_defense_040310.html
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Let's expect that they have done the correct calculations in this case
http://www.newscientist.com/news/news.jsp?id=ns99994793



"The World's No.1 Science & Technology News Service



Closest asteroid to pass Earth approaches


12:27 18 March 04

NewScientist.com news service

An asteroid the size of a small office building will make the closest approach ever recorded to the Earth on Thursday evening

Discovered just two days ago by an automated telescope scanning the sky for near-Earth objects, asteroid 2004 FH will miss the planet by a mere 40,000 kilometres, just over a tenth of the distance to the Moon.

The previous record was set 27 September 2003, when 10-metre asteroid 2003 SQ222 missed the Earth by about twice that distance. However, that object came from inside the Earth's orbit, so its close approach was not recorded until it had passed the Earth."





Shivers
 
Last edited:
12:27 18 March 04

AM or PM? I presume Greenwich? In which case its way past as I post.
 
http://skyandtelescope.com/news/article_1218_1.asp, but since it's an http://cfa-www.harvard.edu/iau/lists/Atens.html*, it will surely be back someday, maybe in the lifetime of many PF members :wink:

*"Atens have semimajor axes less than 1.0 AU, Apollos have perihelion distances less than 1.0 AU and Amors have perihelion distances less than 1.3 AU. Centaur objects have perihelia beyond the orbit of Jupiter and semimajor axes inside the orbit of Neptune. Transneptunian objects have orbits with semimajor axes beyond the orbit of Neptune--some of these objects, generally assumed to be in librations with Neptune, have perihelion distances inside the orbit of Neptune."
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...

Similar threads

Back
Top