Ax=b; every vector b is exactly from one vector x (from row space of A) <more>?

kthurst
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
"Ax=b; every vector b is exactly from one vector x (from row space of A)".. <more>?

Hi,
I m referring 'Linear Algebra and its applications by Gilbert Starng".

I read (ch.3.1)"Matrix transforms every vector from its row space to its column space". Or
if given Ax=b; every vector b is exactly from one vector x (from row space of A).
Just want to know What if we multiply A with some vector x which is not in row space?
(can we do it !?)...
Not able to figure it out. may be i have missed some basic concept or misunderstood it.

Please help me out..
than u..
 
Physics news on Phys.org
##A\, : \,V\longrightarrow V## defines a linear map on the vector space ##V##. We can write ##V=\operatorname{im} A \oplus \ker A##. This means we can split every vector ##v=v_{i}+ v_k## where ##v_i## is in the row space and ##v_k## is sent to zero.
 
I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
Back
Top