Axxis Movement: Lorentz Transformation

  • Thread starter Thread starter karkas
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Parallel
karkas
Messages
131
Reaction score
1
Hey! I have a roughly quick question to ask.

Consider a Cartesian Coordinates system (2dimensions). If we imagine another axxis, different from the already existent ones, as in it is moving parallel to the y axxis and L to the x axxis, then another coordinates system is born, right? In total we have 3 axxi, x'x and y'y of the considered Cartesian, and another one, say k'k. But k'k and x'x form another Cartesian system.

What should be done to find the coordinates of one system using the other is a Lorentz Transform, right? This is what Special Relativity uses, right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm not sure I am understanding you correctly, but no, I don't think what you're describing is like Lorentz transformation at all.

First, just to be clear, you are talking about an alternate coordinate system in the same 2-D space, correct? Both it and the original coordinate system share the same x-axis, but have different parallel y axes - again, correct? If this is the case, then what you've described is a second coordinate system that is related to the first by a translation, specifically a translation in the x-direction.

Lorentz transformations are more akin to rotations, and thus are not really similar to what you've described. They are not ordinary rotations, however, in that they have imaginary rotation angles (that's one way to describe them, anyway), and the axes move opposite directions. For example, if the Lorentz transformation to the rest frame of an object moving in the x-direction corresponded to drawing the x-axis rotated in a counter-clockwise direction, then the t-axis would rotate in the clockwise direction.
 
I started reading a National Geographic article related to the Big Bang. It starts these statements: Gazing up at the stars at night, it’s easy to imagine that space goes on forever. But cosmologists know that the universe actually has limits. First, their best models indicate that space and time had a beginning, a subatomic point called a singularity. This point of intense heat and density rapidly ballooned outward. My first reaction was that this is a layman's approximation to...
Thread 'Dirac's integral for the energy-momentum of the gravitational field'
See Dirac's brief treatment of the energy-momentum pseudo-tensor in the attached picture. Dirac is presumably integrating eq. (31.2) over the 4D "hypercylinder" defined by ##T_1 \le x^0 \le T_2## and ##\mathbf{|x|} \le R##, where ##R## is sufficiently large to include all the matter-energy fields in the system. Then \begin{align} 0 &= \int_V \left[ ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g}\, \right]_{,\nu} d^4 x = \int_{\partial V} ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g} \, dS_\nu \nonumber\\ &= \left(...
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Back
Top