News Backscatter X-rays for airport screening

  • Thread starter Thread starter BobG
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Screening X-rays
AI Thread Summary
Airports are considering the installation of backscatter X-ray machines for passenger screening, which can see through clothing while leaving metal and skin visible, potentially exposing travelers to the monitor. Concerns about privacy violations are prominent, with many arguing that this situation differs significantly from medical examinations. The discussion raises questions about the health risks associated with radiation exposure from these machines, with some participants noting that the radiation dose is comparable to that of sunlight, although the effects may vary. While some express discomfort with the idea, others find the machines acceptable if they meet health standards, citing their efficiency and reliability compared to traditional screening methods like pat-downs. The overarching concern remains the balance between security measures and personal privacy rights.

Do you agree with using backscatter airport x-rays?

  • Yes, security is worth public nudity

    Votes: 1 20.0%
  • Yes, as long as only the screener sees the screen

    Votes: 2 40.0%
  • No, I don't want anyone to see me naked

    Votes: 2 40.0%

  • Total voters
    5
BobG
Science Advisor
Messages
352
Reaction score
88
Airports are thinking about installing new backscatter X-ray machines for screening passengers (http://www.campaignfortruth.com/Eclub/210703/CTM-airportxray.htm

These screeners see through clothes, but bounce off metal and skin, leaving the traveller essentially naked to the person monitoring the screen. Hopefully, the monitor will be in a booth or at least blocked from the view of the public.

Do you see this as a violation of your privacy or more like being seen naked by a doctor?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Violation of privacy, definitely; the situation with the doctor is not really comparable. Plus, what is the radiation dose from this? How much accumulated dosage would frequent flyers pick up in a year? What about our constitutional right to be "secure in our persons"? Doesn't that mean the government agrees not to frisk us if it will harm us? At least without prior cause?
 
Yeah, the health risk might be my only concern. The dose is supposed to be similar to the amount received from sunshine, but the frequencies are different, meaning the effects probably aren't identical.

If they meet health standards, though, I'd find them acceptable. They're faster and more reliable than the current close inspection methods like pat downs or the hand-held wands.
 
The possible radiation dose was the only thing that bothered me about the idea. Otherwise I don't see what the big deal is. Really, just how naked is someone going to look that way?
 
Similar to the 2024 thread, here I start the 2025 thread. As always it is getting increasingly difficult to predict, so I will make a list based on other article predictions. You can also leave your prediction here. Here are the predictions of 2024 that did not make it: Peter Shor, David Deutsch and all the rest of the quantum computing community (various sources) Pablo Jarrillo Herrero, Allan McDonald and Rafi Bistritzer for magic angle in twisted graphene (various sources) Christoph...
Thread 'My experience as a hostage'
I believe it was the summer of 2001 that I made a trip to Peru for my work. I was a private contractor doing automation engineering and programming for various companies, including Frito Lay. Frito had purchased a snack food plant near Lima, Peru, and sent me down to oversee the upgrades to the systems and the startup. Peru was still suffering the ills of a recent civil war and I knew it was dicey, but the money was too good to pass up. It was a long trip to Lima; about 14 hours of airtime...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
3K
Back
Top