Balancing Forces on a Pivot: Q&A

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter jendrix
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of balancing forces on a pivot, particularly focusing on how the position of the pivot affects the moments created by weights on either side of the pivot. Participants explore theoretical scenarios and practical applications related to the principle of moments.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant describes a scenario with a beam and weights, questioning the effects of moving the pivot point and the implications for balancing forces.
  • Another participant suggests that the weight of the beam can be disregarded when calculating moments based solely on the distances from the pivot.
  • A different participant emphasizes that the choice of pivot point is crucial and that moments can be calculated from any point, provided the calculations are done carefully.
  • One participant proposes a specific equation for balancing weights around a pivot, illustrating the principle of moments.
  • Another participant confirms the importance of considering the weight of the beam acting through its center of mass when calculating moments.
  • A later reply questions whether the weight of the beam should be factored in based on its position relative to the pivot, seeking clarification on this aspect.
  • Another participant agrees with the previous point about the weight of the beam and suggests that the turning effect is zero if the pivot is at the center of mass.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a mix of agreement and uncertainty regarding the treatment of the beam's weight and the effects of pivot placement. Some participants assert that the weight of the beam should be considered, while others suggest it can be disregarded in certain calculations. The discussion remains unresolved on these points.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations regarding the assumptions made about the weight distribution of the beam and the specific conditions under which the calculations are performed. Participants do not fully resolve the implications of these assumptions.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for students or individuals interested in understanding the principles of moments and balancing forces in physics, particularly in practical applications involving pivots and beams.

jendrix
Messages
120
Reaction score
4
Hello, I've recently being learning about balancing forces on a pivot.I understand the part about calculating force x distance(from pivot) so that both clockwise and anti-clockwise balance but I'm stuck as to what effect it has when you move the pivot point.

Say for example you have a 10m beam with a central pivot, and a 200n weight 3m to the left of the pivot and a 300n weight 2m to the right of the pivot.This would balance as the forces on either side are 600n.

What effect would moving the pivot 2m metres to the left make if the beam weighed 1000n?

Just to add this isn't a homework question I just thought an example(I hope it's clear:smile:) might make it easier to understand, a lot of the articles I've found only cover the effect when the pivot is in the centre.

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Am I right in thinking that I can disregard the weight of the beam and still work solely on the distance to the pivot on either side?

So the new forces would be:

Left side 1m from pivot x 200n =200n/m

Right side 4m from pivot x 300n = 1200n/m

This would result in a clockwise effect?
 
The problem with Moments questions (and it's sometimes hard to believe) is that it doesn't matter where you take moments - if you do it carefully, then you get the right answer. The secret is usually to choose an appropriate point to take the moments about and then believe in what you are doing. It will all come out in the wash but it may involve solving simple simultaneous equations. An 'appropriate point' would be one through which one of the unknown forces is acting - thus (effectively) making the simultaneous equations easier to solve.

In case you were worrying about it: The weight of the beam all acts through the centre of mass. Don't worry about what bits are on one side or the other of the pivot just use the total weight and a single distance from the pivot. It will come out ok without that added complication.
 
Thanks I think I'm slowly getting there.:smile:

So when a question gives you the beam length and 2 weights to go either side with the aim of balancing the beam, say a 3m beam and 2 weights like 400n and 600n then you'd use an equation like

400n x Distance 1 = 600n x Distance 2 (Distance being from pivot)

I hope that's clear:smile:
 
That's what the principle of moments says. Go for it.
 
Ok so now I've been told something different and was hoping one of you could confirm the right answer.


2m 3m
I-------P-----------I




In the above diagram where the beam is 5m long and the pivot in 2m in from the right, I've been told I should factor on the weight of the beam by taking it's position as being in the centre

So if beam was 500N I would multiply by 0.5 (As pivot is 0.5m from centre)

Is this correct?

Thanks again:smile:
 
That's what I said. Weight of beam at its cm is what counts. You COULD work out the weights of both sections and then say that they each act half way along that section - but you get the same answer.

If the pivot happens to be at the cm, there is zero turning effect. (Confirmation?)
 
Thanks Sophie you've been a big help:smile:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
27
Views
10K