Balancing Redox Equations with Addison-Wesley Chemistry

  • Thread starter Thread starter Yaqout
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Chemistry Redox
AI Thread Summary
Balancing redox equations requires ensuring the total increase in oxidation numbers equals the total decrease, which can involve using fractional coefficients. In the example of KClO3, the correct balanced equation is 2KClO3 → 2KCl + 3O2, where the fraction 3/2 is used to balance the oxygen atoms. The confusion arose from initially misidentifying KClO as the compound instead of KClO3, which has different oxidation states. The steps include assigning oxidation numbers, identifying oxidized and reduced atoms, and checking the final balance of atoms and charge. Understanding these steps is crucial for successfully balancing similar redox equations.
Yaqout
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
Addison-Wesley
CHEMISTRY

Balancing Redox equations (pg. 607-8)

Step 4: Make the total increase in oxidation number equal to the total decrease in oxidation number by using appropriate coefficients.
Practice problem 10b.

KClO (s)==>KCl(aq) + O2(g)

When I did step 4 of this equation, I was unable to understand why and how the fraction 3/2 is put in front of the oxygen gas in the product side. And also why oxygen is chosen from all the other compounds to place the coefficient infront. I would like this point clarified because its been hindering me of comprehending and solving similar equations.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Would you please SHOW us the various steps so we will know what "step 4" is and perhaps be able to see where "3/2" comes in?

It should be clear that "KClO (s)==>KCl(aq) + O2(g)" is incorrect because the left hand side has only one oxygen atom while the right hand side has two.

It has been a long time since I did chemistry and I am not absolutely sure I remember what "oxidation numbers" are but it seems clear to me that the formula has to be
2KClO (s)==>2KCl(aq) + O2(g)
in order to balance the number of atoms on each side.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thank you for responding and sorry for being unclear, I thought you might have the textbook I named within reach so that you would be able to review the section and the practice problems better. Anyways I typed out the Steps to the best of my ability, and if there is anything unclear tell me so.

Step 1: Assign oxidation numbers to all the atoms in the equation.

decrease(+5==>-1)(REDUCTION)
-1 +5 -2
KClO3==>
+1 -1 0
KCl+O2
increase(-2==>0) (OXIDATION)

Step 2: Identify which atoms are oxidized and which are reduced..

Look at the above example.

Step 3: Use a line to connect the atoms that undergo oxidation. Use a separate line to connect the atoms that undergo reduction.

I was unable to do it here, but if you revise the textbook I named you will find it done.

Step 4: Use appropriate coefficients to make the total increase in oxidation number equal to the total decrease in oxidation number.

Here is the difficulty
Their answer is
(1)(-6)=-6
---------------------
KClO3==>KCl+3/2O2
---------------------
(3)(+2)=+6

Step 5: Do a final check to insure the equation is balanced for both atoms and charge.

The final answer:
2KClO3==>2KCl+3O2

Thanks again
 
Yes, now I see MY difficulty at least!

Your original post said:
KClO (s)==>KCl(aq) + O2(g)

NOT KClO3! Probably if it had not been so long since I took chemistry, I would have recognized that there is no such compound as "KClO" but that potassium chlorate is KClO3.

Okay, here's how I would "balance" that equation:

Since O2 has two oxygen atoms, if I multiply O2 by n, the right side will have 2n oxygen atoms. If I multiply the left side of the equation by m, there will be 3m oxygen atoms on the left: we must have 2n= 3m. Obviously, the simplest thing to do is take n=3, m= 2.

Given that we multiply the left side by 2, there are 2 potassium and 2 Chlorine atoms on the left and, to have that number on the right, I have to multiply KCl by 2:

2KClO3= 2KCl+ 3O2.

Although I am talking about atoms rather than "oxidation numbers", it works out to the same thing.
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top