Balancing Redox Reactions: Confusion with Half-Reaction Electron Count

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around balancing the redox reaction involving Cr(OH)3 and ClO3−. The confusion arises from the half-reaction for ClO3−, where the participant questions the need for 6 electrons instead of 5, considering the charges involved. It is clarified that while the total charge on both sides appears to be -1, the 6 electrons represent the change in oxidation state of chlorine, not just charge balance. The participant realizes that the electrons account for the reduction of ClO3− to Cl−, and the presence of 6H+ does not alter the overall charge balance. Ultimately, the understanding of electron count in redox reactions is crucial for accurate balancing.
APHELION
Messages
25
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Cr(OH)3(s) + ClO3−(aq) ® CrO42−(aq) + Cl−(aq) (basic)

I am up the point where I need to balance both half-reactions for electron charge and I'm confused as to why this half reaction: ClO3− + 6H+ + 6e− ® Cl− + 3H2O, has a total of 6 electrons instead of 5. Isn't the overall charge on that side +5, from the difference of 6H+ and 1 ClO3-?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Actually both sides of the half-reaction have charge -1. I looked and it looked balanced to me. If it's balanced, why mess with it?
 
Really they are both -1? I thought that 6H+ (6e) + ClO- (-1e) = 5 electrons. Wouldn't all the hydrogen atoms carry a 6+ charge on that side? And on the other side, I see why Cl- + 3H20 = -1. H20 carries no charge and Cl- is obviously -1.
 
ClO- counts as an extra electron, not a deficiency.
 
What about the 6H+? It doesn't carry a charge?
 
Actually, I just realized the 6 electrons were not for total balance charge but rather the change in Cl by itself, so the -1 charge does make sense. Thank you!
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top