Ball and Bowl and Newton's Second Law

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around understanding the "ball and bowl" problem in the context of Newton's Second Law and conservation of energy. A small sphere rolls down a hemispherical bowl, and the kinetic energy at the bottom is derived using both Newton's Second Law and energy conservation principles. The net force acting on the ball is analyzed through components, leading to the conclusion that the kinetic energy at the bottom equals gR. The conversation highlights that using Newton's Second Law ultimately aligns with the principles of conservation of energy, emphasizing the relationship between force, work, and energy. The participant confirms their understanding and seeks clarification on a homework assignment that was marked incorrect.
RIT_Rich
Hello everyone.

I'm having a little trouble understanding the whole "ball and bowl" problem using Newton's Second Law. What I'm talking about involves a small shpere of mass m and radius r, rolling down a "bowl" (more like a hemisphere of radius R). How would one go about finding the KE of the sphere at the bottom of the hemisphere using Newton's Second Law?

Thanks a lot
 
Science news on Phys.org
Do you really have to use Newton's second law? If I were doing a problem like this, I would use "conservation of energy".

Newton's law says "force is the rate of change of momentum" (which can actually be taken as a definition of force). In the simple case of constant mass, this is "force= mass times acceleration" or
m dv/dt= F.

Model the cross section of the bowl that includes the ball, as it is rolling down, as a circle of radius R. Let theta be the angle formed by the line from the ball to the center of the circle and then to the bottom of the circle. The gravitational force on the ball is -mg, straight down. The ball does not move straight down because the bowl is applying a force toward its center. The net force is tangent to the bowl. Dividing the gravitational force into components parallel and perpendicular to the tangent we see that the angle between perpendicular and vertical lines is also theta. The net force, tangent to the circle, is -mg sin(theta).

Newton's second law now says m dv/dt= -mg sin(theta) (v is the speed along the circumference of the circle). If we measure theta in radians, then the arclength is given by s= Rtheta so
v= ds/dt= R d theta/dt. Newton's second law is now:
R d2theta/dt20= -g sin(theta).
If we let w= dtheta/dt (the angular velocity), then d2theta/dt2= dw/dt. Using the chain rule, dw/dt= dtheta/dt dw/dtheta= w dw/dtheta. Now the equation is R w dw/dtheta= -g sin(theta). We can rewrite this as w dw= -(g/R) sin(theta) dtheta and integrate. That gives (1/2)w2= (g/R) cos(theta)+ C.

At the top of the bowl theta= pi/2 and cos(pi/2)= 0. Also, since the ball started from rest, w= 0 so we have 0= 0+ C or C= 0.

Our equation is (1/2)w2= (g/R) cos(theta).

At the bottom of the bowl, theta= 0 and cos(0)= 1. Therefore,
(1/2)w2= g/R.

We were asked for kinetic energy at the bottom of the bowl. That is (1/2)m v2= (1/2)(Rw)2= R2((1/2)w2)= R2(g/R)= gR.
That's your answer.

Using "conservation of energy", we would have argued that at the top of the bowl, v is 0 and the height is R so the potential energy (relative to the bottom of the bowl) is mgR and the total energy is 0+ mgR= mgR. At the bottom of the bowl, the potential energy is 0 so the kinetic energy must be mgR in order to keep total energy the same. It's that easy!

Actually, if you look at the integral of the equation resulting form Newton's second law, you will see that that IS conservation of energy. If the force, F, depends only on position: F(x), it is a "conservative" force. Newton's second law is m dv/dt= F(x). Again, we can use the chain rule to write this as m v dv/dx= F(x) and rewrite that as m v dv= F(x) dx. Integrating, (1/2)mv2= integral(F(x)dx)+ C or (1/2)mv2- integral(F(x)dx)= C.
The first part of that is kinetic energy. The (negative) integral is the work done against the force: the potential energy. That just says that the total energy is a constant: conservation of energy.
 
Thanks. Thats the answer I got as well. I just needed to know because it got marked wrong on a webassign HW. I probably just didn't write it the right way...but it had to be right.

Thanks
 
I need to calculate the amount of water condensed from a DX cooling coil per hour given the size of the expansion coil (the total condensing surface area), the incoming air temperature, the amount of air flow from the fan, the BTU capacity of the compressor and the incoming air humidity. There are lots of condenser calculators around but they all need the air flow and incoming and outgoing humidity and then give a total volume of condensed water but I need more than that. The size of the...
Thread 'Why work is PdV and not (P+dP)dV in an isothermal process?'
Let's say we have a cylinder of volume V1 with a frictionless movable piston and some gas trapped inside with pressure P1 and temperature T1. On top of the piston lay some small pebbles that add weight and essentially create the pressure P1. Also the system is inside a reservoir of water that keeps its temperature constant at T1. The system is in equilibrium at V1, P1, T1. Now let's say i put another very small pebble on top of the piston (0,00001kg) and after some seconds the system...
Back
Top