Ball thrown with air resistance

AI Thread Summary
When a ball is thrown at an angle with air resistance, it takes more time to fall from its maximum height than to reach that height. The horizontal distance covered before reaching maximum height is typically greater than the distance traveled after reaching maximum height due to the decreasing horizontal speed caused by air resistance. Although the ball slows down both vertically and horizontally, the average speed is higher during the ascent. The discussion highlights the complexity of projectile motion under air resistance, emphasizing the balance between time and distance. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for accurately predicting the ball's trajectory.
amiras
Messages
64
Reaction score
0
This question is bothering me much, please answer in detail.

For example if you throw a ball with initial speed (air resistance exists!) with an angle from horizontal.

1) Does it take more time for ball to reach its maximum height or to fall from maximum height to ground.

2) What horizontal distance is bigger? The distance ball moved before reaching maximum height or distance after reaching maximum height and then reaching the ground.

What I think:
The speed in horizontal direction is getting smaller all the time, so it is higher before reaching the maximum height then after it is going down. (so it might move bigger horizontal distance before reaching maximum height BUT)

But if the ball takes more time to land after it reaches maximum height, then the extra time might overcome the distance moved before reaching maximum height.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well whether the ball moves up or comes back down, it has the same distance to cover.

But, it's constantly slowing down (horizontally and vertically). This means that it's average speed it faster as it's going up...

That's the mathematics talking. If you want to visualize it, imagine what happens when you punch a baloon up in the air...does it take longer for it to go up or come down?
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
It may be shown from the equations of electromagnetism, by James Clerk Maxwell in the 1860’s, that the speed of light in the vacuum of free space is related to electric permittivity (ϵ) and magnetic permeability (μ) by the equation: c=1/√( μ ϵ ) . This value is a constant for the vacuum of free space and is independent of the motion of the observer. It was this fact, in part, that led Albert Einstein to Special Relativity.
Back
Top