Ballistic conduction and Superconductivity

NewtonApple
Messages
45
Reaction score
0
Ballistic conduction occurs when the length of the conductor is smaller than the mean free path of the electron.

Ballistic conduction differs from superconductivity due to the absence of the Meissner effect in the material. A ballistic conductor would stop conducting if the driving force is turned off, whereas in a superconductor current would continue to flow after the driving supply is disconnected.

Can anyone elaborate it?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think it's a wrong forum. I'm re posting it at another forum.
 
Maybe the solid state forum would be better suited.
But anyhow. Even in the balistic regime, you have residual resistance, so that some current in a current loop would decay.
The Meissner effect means something different. If you cool a conductor, it will expell the magnetic field when it becomes superconducting while if it doesn't become superconducting, but only looses resistivity, it won't expell the magnetic field.
 
  • Like
Likes NewtonApple
thx! I'm re-posting it at Solid State forum.
 
Better use the "report" button and ask staff to move it!
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top