Banked Circular Motion with Static Friction

AI Thread Summary
To determine the coefficient of static friction for a car traveling at 95 km/h on a banked curve with a radius of 85 m, the angle of banking (theta) was calculated to be 21.4 degrees. The centripetal force needed for the car's motion is derived from both the static friction and the horizontal component of the normal force. The equation FNcos(theta) = mg was questioned for accuracy, indicating potential confusion in the calculations. The discussion highlights the importance of correctly applying the forces involved in banked circular motion. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for preventing skidding at higher speeds.
milky9311
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Q: "If a curve with a radius of 85m is properly banked for a car traveling 65km/h, what must be the coefficient of static friction for a car not to skid when traveling at 95km/h?"

[PLAIN]http://a4.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-ash4/215513_1974874979462_1470693940_32310002_1293630_n.jpg


2. The attempt at a solution

I found theta

FNcos(theta) = mg

(mgsin(theta))/cos(theta) = (mv2)/r

theta = 21.4o

But next bit i couldn't do.

Wouldnt the centripetal force of the 95km/h car be FNsin(theta) + musFN? as the static friction + the horizontal component of the normal force allows circular motion?

thanks
 

Attachments

  • 제목 없음.JPG
    제목 없음.JPG
    6.8 KB · Views: 468
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
milky9311 said:
FNcos(theta) = mg


FNcos(theta) = mg??:confused: Check that again...
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top