Bankteller Problem: How Many Ways Can Both Men and Women Be Served?

  • Thread starter Thread starter rickdundee
  • Start date Start date
rickdundee
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
HELP! Bankteller Problem

1. Homework Statement
There are 6 males and 4 females awaiting to see a teller at a bank.

Only 4 people can be served at one time.
1) How many ways can four of the people be picked and served one at a time, if they must include two(2) men and two(2) women?


2) If indeed the four people are picked randomly, what is the probability that the four will include two (2) men and two (2) women?
This is the question I am confused about.


3. The Attempt at a Solution
My solution for Problem#1: (6 choose 2) * (4 choose 2) = 90
 
Physics news on Phys.org
2) 6C2 x 4C2 /10C4 = 3/7
 
Last edited:
HELP! Bankteller Problem

Thank you. Could you check this.

It is the end of the day and there are 5 tellers, but each teller can only serve one person. Therefore only five people can be served, each by a teller, so the five people are picked at once.

1) How many ways can five of the people picked and served, if they must include 3 men and 2 women?

My solution: (10c5)*(6c3)*(4c2)

2) If indeed the 5 people are picked randomly, what is the probability that the five will include 3 men and 2 women?

My solution: If the solution to the first question is correct I should be able to figure it out.
 
This is bound to be homework.
 
Actually review of an even answer in the text.
 
2) Just as before,
6C3 x 4C2 / 10C5 =10/21
 
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Thread 'Detail of Diagonalization Lemma'
The following is more or less taken from page 6 of C. Smorynski's "Self-Reference and Modal Logic". (Springer, 1985) (I couldn't get raised brackets to indicate codification (Gödel numbering), so I use a box. The overline is assigning a name. The detail I would like clarification on is in the second step in the last line, where we have an m-overlined, and we substitute the expression for m. Are we saying that the name of a coded term is the same as the coded term? Thanks in advance.
Back
Top