How is the magnetic field of a bar magnet measured and utilized?

AI Thread Summary
The magnetic field of a bar magnet is generated by bound surface currents resulting from the alignment of atomic magnetic moments, primarily due to the electron spins in iron. While the classical model describes these currents, it does not account for the quantum mechanical origins of ferromagnetism. The bound surface current can be measured through the turning moment it creates in response to an external magnetic field. However, this current cannot be utilized externally as it is confined within the material. Overall, the understanding of magnetic fields in bar magnets combines classical and quantum theories.
Wannabeagenius
Messages
90
Reaction score
0
Hi All,

The classical theory of a bar magnet as I understand it is that there are many current loops at the atomic scale which have magnetic moments all pointing in the same direction. At the interior of the magnet, with one loop next to the other, currents go in opposite directions and their effects are canceled. However, at the surface of the magnet, small current loops are not canceled by adjacent loops which results in a current circulating around the outside of the magnet which causes the resulting magnetic field according to the Biot-Savart law.

If this description is true, which I think it is, how is this current measured? Also, is it possible to use this current and if so, what would the effect be? It seems that the bar magnet would gradually lose its magnetism.

Thank you,
Bob
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That is the standard classical model, but it is not in fact the source of ferromagnetism.
Ferromagnetism arises from the magnetic moments of two electrons in the outer shell of iron. But these magnetic moments come from the spin of th electron, treated quantum mechanically by the Dirac equation. In this theory, the point electron has a magnetic moment, but there is no current loop. There still is a bound surface current at the surface of the magnet. It is a real current in the sense that it produces the strong solenoidal B field, but it cannot utilized in any other way because it is bound in the material. The bound current can be measured in the same way as most currents are measured, which is by the turning moment caused by the action of an external B field on it. For a compass, the turning moment is on the compass needle. For an ordinary current, the turning moment is caused by a B field in a galvanometer acting on a wire loop carrying the current.
 
clem said:
That is the standard classical model, but it is not in fact the source of ferromagnetism.
Ferromagnetism arises from the magnetic moments of two electrons in the outer shell of iron. But these magnetic moments come from the spin of th electron, treated quantum mechanically by the Dirac equation. In this theory, the point electron has a magnetic moment, but there is no current loop. There still is a bound surface current at the surface of the magnet. It is a real current in the sense that it produces the strong solenoidal B field, but it cannot utilized in any other way because it is bound in the material. The bound current can be measured in the same way as most currents are measured, which is by the turning moment caused by the action of an external B field on it. For a compass, the turning moment is on the compass needle. For an ordinary current, the turning moment is caused by a B field in a galvanometer acting on a wire loop carrying the current.

Thanks Clem.

Nice explanation.
 
This is from Griffiths' Electrodynamics, 3rd edition, page 352. I am trying to calculate the divergence of the Maxwell stress tensor. The tensor is given as ##T_{ij} =\epsilon_0 (E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} E^2)+\frac 1 {\mu_0}(B_iB_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} B^2)##. To make things easier, I just want to focus on the part with the electrical field, i.e. I want to find the divergence of ##E_{ij}=E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij}E^2##. In matrix form, this tensor should look like this...
Thread 'Applying the Gauss (1835) formula for force between 2 parallel DC currents'
Please can anyone either:- (1) point me to a derivation of the perpendicular force (Fy) between two very long parallel wires carrying steady currents utilising the formula of Gauss for the force F along the line r between 2 charges? Or alternatively (2) point out where I have gone wrong in my method? I am having problems with calculating the direction and magnitude of the force as expected from modern (Biot-Savart-Maxwell-Lorentz) formula. Here is my method and results so far:- This...
Back
Top