Barber's pole - appear faster than light?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion explores the theoretical scenario of a massless barber's pole spinning, where the line on the pole could appear to travel faster than light despite no physical part of the pole exceeding the speed of light. Participants note that this phenomenon aligns with the principles of relativity, which state that no information can be transmitted faster than light. The analogy of a searchlight beam sweeping across vast distances is used to illustrate this concept. While the line may seem to move superluminally, it is not a physical entity, similar to the light beam from a flashlight. Ultimately, the discussion emphasizes that such appearances do not violate the laws of physics.
kyle1320
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
Hi, so imagine this: You have (for this theoretical situation) an entirely massless barber's pole. When it spins, the speed of the of the circumference of the pole is less than the speed the line appears to travel up (or down) the side of the barber's pole. If you were to spin the pole, could the line traveling up the pole appear to go faster than light, even though no physical part of the pole is traveling faster? Disregarding red / blue shift.
 
Science news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF, Kyle. Nothing physical is moving faster than c. It's the same idea as the spot of a searchlight sweeping at superluminal speed. The law of relativity states that no information can be transmitted at or above c; that is not violated by the circumstance in question.
 
kyle1320 said:
could the line traveling up the pole appear to go faster than light, even though no physical part of the pole is traveling faster?
It could. Just as if I pointed a flashlight at the Moon, then whipped it around to point it at Ceres.

The "beam" gets from Moon to Ceres - a distance of hunderds of millions of miles - in a fraction of a second.

Of course, the beam is no more a real thing than the imaginary line you attribute to points on the barber pole.
 
Thread 'A quartet of epi-illumination methods'
Well, it took almost 20 years (!!!), but I finally obtained a set of epi-phase microscope objectives (Zeiss). The principles of epi-phase contrast is nearly identical to transillumination phase contrast, but the phase ring is a 1/8 wave retarder rather than a 1/4 wave retarder (because with epi-illumination, the light passes through the ring twice). This method was popular only for a very short period of time before epi-DIC (differential interference contrast) became widely available. So...
I am currently undertaking a research internship where I am modelling the heating of silicon wafers with a 515 nm femtosecond laser. In order to increase the absorption of the laser into the oxide layer on top of the wafer it was suggested we use gold nanoparticles. I was tasked with modelling the optical properties of a 5nm gold nanoparticle, in particular the absorption cross section, using COMSOL Multiphysics. My model seems to be getting correct values for the absorption coefficient and...
Back
Top