Baryon quark model: just a question

Jake-Blues
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I'm in trouble on answer to this question: "Wich is the (most probable) symmetry of the spatial part of the wavefunction for the lightest baryons? Why?"

I know that the spatial and spin parts of a baryon wavefunction must be simmetric under an interchange of any two quarks (this is an assumption on the quark static model, at least for the lightest baryons: the Pauli principle is not violated because there's the colour degree of freedom: to be "colourless" a baryon must be antysimmetric on the colour degree of freedom, so his "total" wavefunction results antysimmetric), and i also know that the spatial part in the lightest baryons has l=0, but I'm not able to motivate that answer exactly.

What i am forgetting?
Someone can help me?

Sorry for my english.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The lowest energy state of any system generally has no nodes.
Nodes introduce more curvature into the wave function which increases the energy. This makes the state with no internal or total orbital angular momentum the ground state.
 
Meir Achuz said:
The lowest energy state of any system generally has no nodes.
Nodes introduce more curvature into the wave function which increases the energy. This makes the state with no internal or total orbital angular momentum the ground state.




Then, talking about symmetry of the spatial part of the wavefunction, it's a spherical one, the most probably?

Thank you.
 
It is a three body wave function. While it has no angular momentum, it need not be completely spherical. That is, the distance between the two u quarks in a proton can be larger than that between a u land d quari.
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top