Baryons and their quark constituents

  • Thread starter Thread starter Atomos
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Baryons Quark
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the properties of baryons and their quark constituents, specifically addressing the spin of baryons like delta +1 and protons. It clarifies that spins are not simply additive in the traditional sense; rather, they are represented as spinors, leading to different addition rules. A system of three spin 1/2 particles can yield total spins of either 1/2 or 3/2, depending on their alignment. The confusion arises from the misconception that spins can be summed numerically, which is incorrect. Understanding these principles is crucial for demonstrating how baryons derive their properties from quarks.
Atomos
Messages
165
Reaction score
0
I have been given an assingment where I must show that the properties of the up, down and strange quarks follow from the properties of the baryons. I am just wondering why delta +1 (a baryon) has a spin 3/2 when it is, like a proton, composed of up, up, down. Aren't spins additive? and how do all of the 3/2 and 1/2 spin baryons follow from the combination of the up, down, and strange quarks alone? I can count only 10 combinations of those 3 types.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you think spins are additive in the sense of 1/2+1/2+1/2=3/2 you would be wrong. And if you do think this you should be wondering why the proton has spin 1/2 rather than 3/2. A system of three spin 1/2 particles can be in a total spin state of either 1/2 or 3/2.
 
spins are "additive" but they are not numbers, they are spinors. addition rules are different.. but still makes a lot sense, eg. spin +1/2 and spin -1/2 adds to spin 0 (this is just means the spins of the two constitutents are anti-align. so with 3 spins states, you can have \pm 1/2 \text{or} \pm 3/2 that means you get a spin 1/2 or 3/2 particle.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
172
Replies
5
Views
2K
Back
Top