The Basel Problem: A Solid Solution Using Derivatives and Integrals

  • Thread starter hover
  • Start date
In summary, the conversation discusses a solution to the Basel problem found on the internet, which involves derivatives and integrals and is considered more solid than Euler's original solution. However, there is confusion about the logic used in the solution, specifically regarding the use of the sum of the reciprocals of the powers of 4. The conversation ends with someone attempting to explain the logic behind it.
  • #1
hover
343
0
http://www.maa.org/news/howeulerdidit.html"
"[URL
[/URL]
I found a nice solution to the Basel problem on the internet which I am liking very much. It deals with derivatives and integrals and appears to be a much more solid solution to the Basel problem than Euler's original solution. There is just one thing I am having trouble with to understand the solution. I think it is just me being an idiot but I can't understand the end of the second page,

The series on the right is the sum of the reciprocal of the odd squares, tantalizingly close to the Basel problem, and an easy trick makes it into a solution. Any number is the product of an odd number and a power of 2. For odd numbers, the power of 2 is 2^0 . Hence, any square is the product of an odd square and a power of 4. So, Euler multiplies this equation by the sum of the reciprocals of the powers of 4, as follows:

It sounds like garble and I don't get the logic. Can someone explain to me?

Thanks! :smile:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
  • #2
hover said:
http://www.maa.org/news/howeulerdidit.html"
"[URL
[/URL]
I found a nice solution to the Basel problem on the internet which I am liking very much. It deals with derivatives and integrals and appears to be a much more solid solution to the Basel problem than Euler's original solution. There is just one thing I am having trouble with to understand the solution. I think it is just me being an idiot but I can't understand the end of the second page,

It sounds like garble and I don't get the logic. Can someone explain to me?

Thanks! :smile:

Are you referring to this quote?:

"Any number is the product of an odd number and a power of 2. For odd numbers, the power of 2 is 2^0 . Hence, any square is the product of an odd square and a power of 4. "

All it is saying is that if n is odd, n = 20*n and n2 = 40*n2, which isn't saying much.

If n is even, factor out all factors of 2 so n has the form n = 2pk for some odd integer k. Then n2=22pk2 = 4pk2.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #3
LCKurtz said:
Are you referring to this quote?:

"Any number is the product of an odd number and a power of 2. For odd numbers, the power of 2 is 2^0 . Hence, any square is the product of an odd square and a power of 4. "

All it is saying is that if n is odd, n = 20*n and n2 = 40*n2, which isn't saying much.

If n is even, factor out all factors of 2 so n has the form n = 2pk for some odd integer k. Then n2=22pk2 = 4pk2.

I'm sorry but I'm still having a hard time understanding. I don't see what the small quote(what I quoted in my first post) is talking about or referring to. The equation above where I quoted says pi^2/8 = ∑ 1/(1+2 k)^2 (n = 0 to infinity). I don't see how euler knows to multiply by 4/3 to get pi^2/6 and solve the Basel problem. :(
 
  • #4
I would try to answer to your question.
I had the same problems at that point when I read the text for the first time.
I think it can be explained as follows:
Every integer number, let's say 1,2,3,4... can be written as an odd number multiplied for some power of 2. If we take any odd number, let's say 7, we can have 7=7*2^0, 14=7*2^1 and so on.
The point is that if we start from the ensemble of just the odd numbers (1,3,5,7...) we can obtain the whole list of integer numbers by multiplying every term by the ensemble of powers of 2 (1,2,4,8...)
Therefore, to pass from the sum of the reciprocals of the odd squares to the sum of the reciprocal of all the integers we multiply the first sum by the sum of the reciprocal of the powers of 4 (2 squared). This last sum is equal to 3/4.
I hope this will be of some help
 
  • #5


I am always intrigued by different approaches to solving problems. The Basel problem has been a topic of interest for centuries and it is exciting to see new solutions being proposed. The use of derivatives and integrals in this solution is a clever approach and shows the power of mathematical tools in solving complex problems.

To address your confusion about the end of the second page, let's break down the logic step by step. The goal is to find a way to manipulate the series on the right, which is the sum of the reciprocals of the odd squares, so that it becomes the solution to the Basel problem.

1. Any number can be written as the product of an odd number and a power of 2. For example, 10 can be written as 5 x 2^1.

2. For odd numbers, the power of 2 is always 2^0, which is just 1. So, for odd numbers, we can write the product as the number itself. For example, 5 can be written as 5 x 1.

3. Similarly, any square number can be written as the product of an odd square and a power of 4. For example, 25 can be written as 5^2 x 4^0.

4. Now, let's apply this logic to the series on the right. We can write each term in the series as the reciprocal of an odd square multiplied by a power of 4. For example, 1/9 can be written as 1/(3^2 x 4^0).

5. If we multiply the entire series by the sum of the reciprocals of the powers of 4, we get the following:

(1/1 + 1/4 + 1/16 + 1/64 + ...) x (1 + 1/4 + 1/16 + 1/64 + ...)

Note that the second term in the above equation is the sum of the reciprocals of the powers of 4.

6. Simplifying the above equation, we get:

(1/1 + 1/4 + 1/16 + 1/64 + ...) x (1 + 1/4 + 1/16 + 1/64 + ...) = 1 + (1/4 + 1/16 + 1/64 + ...) + (1/4 + 1/16
 

1. What is the Basel problem?

The Basel problem, also known as the Basel sum, is a mathematical problem posed by Pietro Mengoli in 1644. It asks for the exact value of the infinite sum of the reciprocals of all the square numbers (1/1^2 + 1/2^2 + 1/3^2 + ...).

2. Why is the Basel problem significant?

The Basel problem is significant because it was one of the most famous and long-standing unsolved problems in mathematics. It also has connections to other areas of mathematics, such as number theory and complex analysis.

3. Who solved the Basel problem?

The Basel problem was famously solved by the mathematician Leonhard Euler in 1735 at the age of 28. He found that the sum converges to pi^2/6, which is approximately 1.64493.

4. How did Leonhard Euler solve the Basel problem?

Euler used a clever approach known as the Euler-Maclaurin summation formula, which allowed him to express the infinite sum as a function of the zeta function. He then manipulated the zeta function to find its value at 2, which is equivalent to pi^2/6.

5. What are the applications of the Basel problem solution?

The solution to the Basel problem has implications in various areas of mathematics, including number theory, complex analysis, and probability. It has also been used in the field of physics to calculate the Casimir effect, which is a quantum phenomenon involving the attraction between two parallel uncharged metal plates.

Similar threads

  • General Math
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Math Proof Training and Practice
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • General Math
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • General Math
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
251
Replies
68
Views
9K
  • General Math
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • General Math
Replies
13
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Back
Top