Bases, Invertibility and Injectivity Query

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ad123q
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bases
Ad123q
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
Hi

There are two things that are confusing me a bit, and was wondering if anyone could explain them.

Firstly, if we let V1,V2,...,Vn be vectors in some field F^n and let P = {V1,V2,...,Vn},
then the following are equivalent:

(i) {V1,V2,...,Vn} is a basis for F^n ;
(ii) P is invertible.

Secondly, let T be a linear map. Then if T is invertible, then it is injective.

Thanks for the hep in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm not quite sure what you mean by "P is invertible".
As I see it, P is just a set (with n vectors as its elements). What does it mean for a set to be invertible? Or is there some definition / notation that is not generally used here?

For the second one I can help you: to show that T is injective, you should have that whenever T(x) = T(y) (for arbitrary x and y in the domain), then x = y. This is almost trivial to prove: apply the inverse of T to both sides!
 
I think Ad123q means that P is the matrix whose column vectors V1, V2, etc.

If P is invertible then the V1, V2, etc must be linearly independent. Conversely, it is also true that if the V1, V2, etc are linearly independent, then the matrix P must be invertible.

To get a feel for this, suppose two columns of a matrix were linearly dependent. (Say the ith and jth.) Then that would mean that two linearly independent vectors would be mapped by P onto the same line. (Specifically, the ith and jth standard basis vectors.) Speaking loosely, this destroys information about the vectors being multiplied by P, so you can't invert P.
 
I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
Back
Top