Basic concept doubts in redox reactions

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on determining whether the reaction of [C2O4]-2 to CO2 involves oxidation or reduction, and how many electrons are involved. The oxidation states of carbon change from +3 to +4, indicating that carbon loses electrons. Initially, there was confusion about the interpretation of these oxidation states, but it was clarified that carbon loses a total of 2 electrons in the reaction. The correct half-reaction shows that 2 electrons are indeed removed, confirming that the reaction is an oxidation process. Understanding the reaction through half-reactions simplifies the analysis of electron transfer.
takando12
Messages
122
Reaction score
5

Homework Statement


[C2O4]-2 ------> CO2
Find if the reaction is oxidation or reduction and determine the no. of electrons lost or gained by carbon.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


I started with finding the oxidation states of both elements. It's 3+ and 2- for carbon and oxygen on the LHS and 4+ and 2- for carbon and oxygen on the RHS. But i am having trouble in interpreting these values.
the OS of carbon goes from 3+ to 4+. My interpretation of this was that C had lost 3 electrons on the LHS while lost 4 electrons on the RHS to O. Hence I thought that C should have gained 1 electron. And this means it's reduction and that's the wrong answer. Can someone please correct my interpretation and help me out with this? This is quite a silly and basic question. Please bear with me, I am new to this.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
takando12 said:
C had lost 3 electrons on the LHS while lost 4 electrons on the RHS to O. Hence I thought that C should have gained 1 electron.

Think it over.

But in general, this is much easier done without oxidation numbers, just using half reactions. It is trivial to balance atoms, then it is trivial to see where the electrons have to be added (on which side) to balance the charge.
 
Borek said:
Think it over.

But in general, this is much easier done without oxidation numbers, just using half reactions. It is trivial to balance atoms, then it is trivial to see where the electrons have to be added (on which side) to balance the charge.
Ok I tried again. The OS of C on LHS is 3+ meaning there are 3 more protons than electrons. This goes to a 4+ on the RHS , 4 more protons than electrons , which means 1 electron must have been removed. And balancing the reaction we get 2CO2 on the LHS. So multiplying the OS with the no of atoms., i got 6+ on the LHS and 8+ on the RHS. Hence applying the same logic, 2 electrons must have been removed? Is this right?
 
Yes, electrons are removed.

C2O42- → 2CO2 + 2e-
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top