Basic Electricity: What is Neutral Wire & Why We Need It

  • Thread starter Thread starter Russell Ensslin
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Electricity
AI Thread Summary
The neutral wire serves as a return path for current to the source, allowing alternating current (AC) to flow through a load without causing a short circuit. It is typically grounded at various points in the electrical system, which enhances safety by preventing electric shocks from faults. The distinction between neutral and ground is important; neutral carries current under normal conditions, while ground provides a safety path for fault currents. Proper grounding and bonding are crucial for electrical safety and power quality, ensuring that fault currents are effectively managed. Understanding the roles of neutral and ground helps prevent electrical hazards and maintain system integrity.
Russell Ensslin
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
What is the neutral wire? Why do we need that?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Neutral wire provide a path for a returning current to the "source" (neutral is a wire that carrying the full load current).
 
Thank you for your response.
Some you tube videos say alternating current changes directions frequently. Does it change back and fourth through the two hot wires? why doesn't the neutral cause a short? Other sources say high-tension lines can overbuild up too much charge causing risk of "static" discharge; would this be a short? or Ground?
 
Last edited:
Hello Russel and Welcome - I disagree a little with Jony, the Neutral wire does provide a path back to the source, but does not necessarily carry the full load current. Think of the the Neutral as a Neutral point in the system. In most (not all) systems the neutral is grounded near the source. This allows for a path of current back to the source, but keeps the ground out of the normal path - there are many reasons for this being beneficial.

And yes - Alternating Current "alternates" direction but this is both current and voltage - So power can be delivered TO the load with the current flowing in both directions - this is represented in P = V * I .

So a load can be load can be connected between a "hot" leg and the neutral - the current then flows through the load and the neutral. But you would not connect the Neutral to the Hot leg - this would cause a short - the idea is to deliver energy to a load.
 
  • Like
Likes Russell Ensslin
As for the AC current we simply measure all the voltage with respect to the neutral wire (neutral wire is our reference point).
View attachment 85300
And this means that
meBigGuy said:
The current flows out of HOT and into NEUTRAL (through the load) while the voltage on HOT is POSITIVE. When the voltage on HOT momentarily goes to zero there is no current flow. Then, when the voltage on HOT goes negative the current flows out of NEUTRAL and into HOT (through the load). The current can flow into or out of NEUTRAL (through the load) depending on whether HOT is positive or negative voltage. The current can flow in either direction through the load. In almost all cases it doesn't matter to the load which way the current flows, which is why it can accept AC voltage directly, like a toaster or a filament light bulb. (we will skip the exceptions for now).

And we in Europe use this grid system.
 
So if the Neutral is grounded near the source, won't that break the circuit? In other words; if the load comes from the hot leg to the resistance (application) then to the Neutral (ground) why do we call it the Neutral not Ground? And why can't we ground it at the resistance like DC?
 
So let's see if I have this straight. The application doesn't care if the load is positive or negative, as long as there is current carrying voltage back and fourth; or in one direction for that matter, as long as there is current.
 
Greetings Russell
welcome to PF :smile:

Russell Ensslin said:
So if the Neutral is grounded near the source, won't that break the circuit? In other words; if the load comes from the hot leg to the resistance (application) then to the Neutral (ground) why do we call it the Neutral not Ground?

The neutral is connected to ground in several common places ...
1) at the power station,
2) at the transformer pole in your street/suburb,
3) at the power distribution board in your house or business

we call it neutral, because we ALSO have an Earth (ground) wire in a standard 3 pin plug/socket ... Some appliances only have a hot (phase/live) and neutral.
Others have an Earth ( ground) wire as well that connects to the appliances metal chassis/casing

Russell Ensslin said:
And why can't we ground it at the resistance like DC?

have no idea what you mean by that ... a DC circuit also uses 2 wires the positive wire and negative aka 0V wire

Russell Ensslin said:
The application doesn't care if the load is positive or negative, as long as there is current carrying voltage back and fourth; or in one direction for that matter, as long as there is current.

a lot of confusion in there
voltage isn't carried anywhere. Moving electrons are the current. The electrons are the charge carriers
many AC appliances don't care about polarity ... a light globe, a heater ( in all its forms ... oven (not microwave), room heater, jug/kettle)
Other things require the correct phase and neutral connections ... eg motors

In an AC system, the electrons don't really go anywhere, they just move rapidly back and forward about a point/position ( oscillate)
Your light globe in your house will never see the electrons that are moving in the wire in the generator at the power station

It is the EM (electromagnetic) wave that carries the energy through the circuitDave
 
  • Like
Likes Russell Ensslin
davenn said:
Greetings Russell
welcome to PF :smile:
"The neutral is connected to ground in several common places ..."

If the neutral connects to the ground then why not ground it at the device? Why carry the load back to supply after the application if it's going to be grounded before it gets back to the transformer?
 
  • #10
Russell Ensslin said:
If the neutral connects to the ground then why not ground it at the device? Why carry the load back to supply after the application if it's going to be grounded before it gets back to the transformer?

because you DONT want the metal chassis to be part of the AC circuit

the separate Earth connection gives a safety factor, if the phase/live becomes dislodged and touches the chassis, there will be an instant fuse blow back at the power panel
D
 
  • #11
My question is; what is the difference between in neutral in the ground? Especially if you're going to connect the neutral to the ground after it's done whatever job it has to do? And how can it do that job if it gets connected to ground before it reaches the transformer?
 
  • #12
So the grounded conductor is a phase of the circuit ? And the ground is a safety from fault?
 
  • #13
The ground provides path for fault current. This happened at a site where i worked. My laptop would give me electric shocks. There was no ground at the socket where I would plug the charger. If i'd touch the metallic edge of the laptop I'd get small currents. I made a practice of using a page to flip open the laptop n was careful to restrict touching only the keyboard.

if there is any insulation failure in the appliance n if you touch the metallic edge, then leakage current may flow from appliance edge to ground through your body. but if the appliance is grounded, then the leakage current will flow through the ground wire.
a ground wire isn't supposed to carry current under normal conditions. though the secondary of transformer is grounded, current won't flow through it under normal conditions.
electric_hookup_okay.jpg
 
  • #14
jaus tail said:
if there is any insulation failure in the appliance n if you touch the metallic edge, then leakage current may flow from appliance edge to ground through your body. but if the appliance is grounded, then the leakage current will flow through the ground wire.
a ground wire isn't supposed to carry current under normal conditions. though the secondary of transformer is grounded, current won't flow through it under normal conditions.
Yes. This is correct. I just wanted to post a couple of my favorite images from http://ecmweb.com/bonding-amp-grounding/grounding-vs-bonding-part-1-12

This one shows the currents path of a fault through the safety ground.

501ecm17fig2.jpg


This one shows the "touch potential" due to an inadequate ground.

501ecm17fig4.jpg
 
  • Like
Likes davenn
  • #15
Thanks for the image dlgoff. I have one question. Current always flows through least resistive path. So in the first image, if we look to the left, then at the secondary of the transformer why does current flow X1---meter---main---panel---outlet---load---X0 instead of X1---X0---ground, since X0 is grounded?
 
  • #16
J-T -- the current needs to flow in a loop. If it goes X1 - X0 - Ground- then to where? -- Be careful with the thought "Current always flows through least restive path." - this can be misleading thinking that ALL of the current flows in the least restive path; when we have 2 or more paths the current will divide and the least restive will carry more current than the higher restive path.
Russel - the Neutral is part of the circuit normally, it is A (as opposed to the only) return path to the source. The process of grounding ( earthing) is primarily for safety, but has other benefits when well applied, such as affecting power quality, noise, etc.
 
  • Like
Likes Russell Ensslin
  • #17
jaus tail said:
Current always flows through least resistive path.
From the same website that I posted the previous images from ...
One of the most dangerous ideas circulating in the electrical industry is that electricity follows the path of least resistance. But if it did, not a single one of our electronic gadgets would work.
Understanding how electricity flows through a circuit
 
  • Like
Likes Russell Ensslin
  • #18
So I've been researching and have found that the load tries to get back to it's place of origin; not the ground. That's why its called the neutral.
 
  • #19
Thanks for the X1 to X0 to Ground then where? That what i was thinking while posting what i said. But then what happens in case of fault? Like when lightning strikes or in case of insulation failure of appliance where current leaks to the appliance body and could give the user a shock if the appliance isn't grounded.

Like the current indicated by green arrow in the diagram. That current goes to ground but doesn't return to the appliance from where it is leaking.

Maybe there must be two separate grounds: one at load end and one at secondary transformer:

808ecm13fig3.gif


Any insight would be helpful...
 
  • #20
jaus tail said:
Thanks for the X1 to X0 to Ground then where? That what i was thinking while posting what i said. But then what happens in case of fault? Like when lightning strikes or in case of insulation failure of appliance where current leaks to the appliance body and could give the user a shock if the appliance isn't grounded.

Like the current indicated by green arrow in the diagram. That current goes to ground but doesn't return to the appliance from where it is leaking.

Maybe there must be two separate grounds: one at load end and one at secondary transformer:

808ecm13fig3.gif


Any insight would be helpful...
You are asking a very important question here. You should go through all of the Grounding vs Bonding parts. I'll provide some quotes, followed by images, that I consider high points from those parts.

The Earth's resistance is too great for it to be an effective bonding jumper. Very little fault current returns to the power source winding if the Earth is the only fault-current return path. ...
.
.
.
Properly grounding and bonding service equipment improves safety while eliminating a common cause of power quality problems. You just have to make the right connections in the right places. If you think in terms of providing a low-impedance ground-fault path back to the source, you'll have no problem.
503ecm17fig3.jpg


The benefits of proper bonding include clearing faults, preventing shock, and reducing fires. Grounding provides a low-impedance path for lighting, and properly grounded systems operate as intended. Improperly grounded systems create fertile ground for power quality problems.
505ecm17fig1.jpg
The preferred practice is to not use the grounded conductor (neutral) as the effective ground-fault current path. Instead, you should install an equipment grounding (bonding) conductor with the feeder conductors to the building or structure ...
505ecm17fig3.jpg


... electrons that leave a power supply are trying to get back to their source, not back to the earth. However, lightning is trying to get to earth.
this quote and image is from http://ecmweb.com/content/earth-not-bonding-jumper
... bonding jumpers tie the grounding system together through a reliable low-impedance path.
0101ecwb01fig1.gif


I hope this will give you an idea of the considerations. That's why there are electrical codes ... to minimize risks.
 
  • Like
Likes Russell Ensslin and davenn
  • #21
Windadct said:
J-T -- the current needs to flow in a loop. If it goes X1 - X0 - Ground- then to where? -- Be careful with the thought "Current always flows through least restive path." - this can be misleading thinking that ALL of the current flows in the least restive path; when we have 2 or more paths the current will divide and the least restive will carry more current than the higher restive path.
Russel - the Neutral is part of the circuit normally, it is A (as opposed to the only) return path to the source. The process of grounding ( earthing) is primarily for safety, but has other benefits when well applied, such as affecting power quality, noise, etc.
What is X1? X0? Is there an image somewhere?
 
  • #22
I was responding to J-T (p15) asking about the top image in P14
 
  • #23
I was asking regarding this image: like in case of fault at the load end(extreme right side) the fault current(green line) flows from appliance to outlet to panel to main to meter to X0 and then to ground
Why does this not happen in normal working case like: X1 to X0 to ground or X2 to X0 to ground.
thanks for pointing out that lightning wants to reach the ground.
3A%2F%2Fecmweb.com%2Fsite-files%2Fecmweb.com%2Ffiles%2Farchive%2Fecmweb.com%2Fmag%2F501ecm17fig2.jpg

Figure_24_08_09.jpg

I guess both the source and load ends must be grounded and the ground will act as return from load to source in case any insulation breaks at load end.
 
  • #24
I really like your second image ( but apparently my opinion here sucks) - if I read this right you answered your own question?
 
  • Like
Likes Russell Ensslin
  • #25
Windadct said:
( but apparently my opinion here sucks)
Why would you think this? :oldconfused: This is a discussion forum that values reaching clear understandings of scientific concepts.
 
  • Like
Likes Russell Ensslin
  • #26
I hope you guys know that you help a lot of people. Just because someone gets on here an asks a few questions and then you never hear from them again doesn't mean you haven't helped them. #155 posts! 866 posts! I bet more than a few of those posts have improved the lives of more than a few people.
 
  • #27
So the un-spent electrons need to get back to the source? Is that it? If the electrons come out of the hot leg and go into the appliance and get spent as work why then does anything need to get back to the source? Why not just the hot leg to the appliance and the appliance burn the amps in the form of current? Why neutral? Does the returning neutral current have less current? Does the ampacity start out with say 20 amps and then the vacuum cleaner use say 3 amps and then the remaining 17 amps return as spent current via the neutral to re-unite with the other electrons back at the transformer? Why not just stay in the hot leg wire until their turn to power the vacuum cleaner? Back at the transformer how does the spent amps get back over to the hot leg? Why don't they drain out into the ground electrode?
 
  • #28
These must sound like stupid questions but I'd rather ask and look silly than not ask and actually be.
 
  • #29
Russell Ensslin said:
So the un-spent electrons need to get back to the source? Is that it? If the electrons come out of the hot leg and go into the appliance and get spent as work why then does anything need to get back to the source?

No, this is incorrect, particularly as far as an AC system is concerned
A way back in post #8 I commented that the electrons don't really go anywhere ...

Davenn said:
In an AC system, the electrons don't really go anywhere, they just move rapidly back and forward about a point/position ( oscillate)
Your light globe in your house will never see the electrons that are moving in the wire in the generator at the power station

Russell Ensslin said:
Does the ampacity start out with say 20 amps and then the vacuum cleaner use say 3 amps and then the remaining 17 amps return as spent current

no, The resistance of the circuit ( wire resistance + the load) determines the current flowing in the circuit
The wall outlet may be rated at 20A ... that's the max rating, it isn't supplying that amount all the time
lets take the 240VAC mains where I live, and you plug in a 100W light globe,
I ( amps) = Power (Watts) / V (Volts)
I = 100 / 240
I = 0.416 A being drawn even tho the outlet can supply 20 A

another example
a 1000W room heater
I = W/V
I = 1000 / 240
I = 4.16 A

now knowing the current being drawn by the heater element you can now work out its resistance

R (resistance) = Volts / Amps

work it out :smile:

so you see there are no spent or unspent amps :wink:cheers
Dave
 
  • #30
Now I should also mention that, because of the heating of the lamp filament and the heater element wire
their resistances will change a bit ... but we won't go down that path at the moment

You need to grasp hold of the basics first :smile:D
 
  • #31
Thank you davenn. This is all very instructional. But my question not being correct makes understanding difficult.
Something is fueling the appliance. I'm trying to get my head around what, from the supply, is reduced by the 4 amp load?. If I=E/R and your heater is 4 amperes then the amperes or the voltage must be reduced. NEC 250.4 (A) (2)"conductive...equipment...shall be grounded so as to limit the VOLTAGE to ground".
So if the Amps arent being spent then the voltage must be what is being reduced by some measurable amount. That measurement being Watts?
 
  • #32
Hi Russell

Russell Ensslin said:
So if the Amps arent being spent then the voltage must be what is being reduced by some measurable amount.
that's right ... no amps are being spent, the number of amps going into a load is the same as the number coming out of the load back to the power supply.

OK let's get back to basics :smile:
look at one of my drawings, a really basic circuit, a battery and a resistor

cct1.GIF


a 10V battery and a 1 Ohm load
using Ohms law, work out for me the current flowing in the circuit ?
Also, what do you think is the voltage drop across the resistor ( load) ?

Dave
 
  • #33
So if an electron could be called a charged particle and the voltage could be considered the amount of that charge and the little booger only wiggles on the wire outside the appliance (never goes in) then the amount of charge (voltage) on the charged particle must be diminished.
 
  • #34
One ohm is zero resistance. Right?
 
  • #35
Russell Ensslin said:
So if an electron could be called a charged particle and the voltage could be considered the amount of that charge and the little booger only wiggles on the wire outside the appliance (never goes in) then the amount of charge (voltage) on the charged particle must be diminished.?

An electron IS a charged particle. It has a negative charge
In an AC circuit, the electrons never move any significance, They just oscillate back and forward about a point. The electrons in the load never leave the load
But in a DC circuit, there is a general motion of electrons through the circuit from the negative of the power supply to the positive terminal. For every electron that leaves the negative terminal into the circuit, another one leaves the circuit and enters the positive terminal.
The main driving force on the electron motion in both cases is the electric field. I don't want to go deeply into an explanation of that ... there's those on the forum much better skilled at being able to do that :smile:

Russell Ensslin said:
One ohm is zero resistance. Right?

no :smile: 1 Ohm is 1 Ohm resistance, 0 Ohm is zero resistanceDave
 
Last edited:
  • #37
an analogy would be water flowing through a pipe in a rectangular circuit. and in the pipe there are turbines that the flowing water must move. there is a pump at one end.

now you have only limited water in the pipe. the voltage source is the pump while the resistance is the turbine. the pump will push the water to the turbine. the turbine will move. if the turbine is very rigid/heavy then it won't move and the water will be blocked. as in the water won't move ahead, go back to the pump.

if i increase the pump power, then the pump will push the water at more speed n force, this water will move the turbine n the water will continue to flow at reduced speed, then return to the pump. the pump will again push this water, which will again move the turbines, which will again allow water to move ahead n return to pump.

if i add more turbines, I'm adding more resistance. in this case the pump needs to be stronger/voltage source needs to be of higher voltage. current can be compared to the speed with which the water flows which reduces as i add more turbines.
 
  • #38
Hi Folks,

Didn't know what other thread to ask this on.

I have an electrical power eng book which keeps referring to negative current with respect to thyristors. Am I missing something here, is there such a thing. Current always flows from high to low potential. So if your terminal voltage is reversed to allow current to flow in the other direction, it is still a positive current flow?thanks

Any suggestions.
 
  • #39
Bringitondown said:
Hi Folks,

Didn't know what other thread to ask this on.

I have an electrical power eng book which keeps referring to negative current with respect to thyristors. Am I missing something here, is there such a thing. Current always flows from high to low potential. So if your terminal voltage is reversed to allow current to flow in the other direction, it is still a positive current flow?thanks

Any suggestions.
start a new thread of your own with the above Q, rather than hijacking some one elses thread
then we can get this post of yours removed

thanks lots

Dave
 
  • Like
Likes dlgoff
  • #40
No bother tadger, feel free
 
  • #41
This thread has drifted every which way. To return to the OP and 'neutral'. In a domestic situation, the Neutral is merely one of two wires which go to a device and carry the current. (equal currents because they are the only paths used). Using a Neutral, rather than two equal status wires, makes no difference in most respects. No one would ever use (knowingly) the Earth conductor as a 'return' wire. As has been mentioned, it's a safety measure and carries no power.
Unfortunately, the situation with three phase distribution was introduced to the thread. That is very very different and adds loads of possible confusion. The HV system is connected to the consumer via a Transformer and there is no 'current' connection (no electrical path) between your kettle and the generator. The function of a Three Phase Neutral is totally different from the neutral in your home. To get into the complexities of the ways that three phase supplies can be distributed involves a whole gear change and the domestic wiring system should be sorted out way before three phases are tackled.
IN matters of EE, 'one step at a time' is the way forward.
 
  • Like
Likes OmCheeto
  • #42
The equipment grounding conductors (safety grounds) must bond everything metal together and to the Earth ground and the neutral, but they must also be connected so that current does not normally flow through them. The current flowing though them in the event of a ground fault is needed to trip the circuit breaker.

Because the Earth ground is not low impedance, grounds to the Earth must be installed periodically. The neutral is solidly connected to the entire electrical system, and must be connected to the Earth with ground stakes at the following points (and only the following points):

1. The generating station
2. Every transformer
3. Every power pole
4. Every service entrance electricity usage meter
5. Every main power distribution panel at a service entrance

All equipment protective grounds must be kept separate from the neutral conductors at all points except the service entrance power distribution panel. At only that point, all of the neutrals are tied to all of the equipment grounds. Examples of the dangers of interconnecting neutrals and equipment grounds at points other than at the service entrance include:

- Years ago, people used to connect the equipment ground to the neutral at the load to save wire. The problem is, if the neutral wire breaks at any point in the circuit, the metal case of the equipment is now energized at line voltage.

- When an outbuilding is connected to a service in another building, the neutral must be kept separate from the equipment ground because current flows through the neutral. The equipment ground must be connected to the panel, and the panel must be bonded to all substantial building parts and a ground stake at the outbuilding. Otherwise, a shock could occur between a concrete pad at Earth ground and the shell of a metal power tool.

- Even such innocuous-looking items as water pipes, metal fences, downspouts, and posts should be bonded to the equipment ground at the service entrance.if there is a chance of someone coming into contact with both the electrical equipment ground and one of these other items. The death of a child a few years ago emphasizes this need:

The child was playing in a city park and touched a streetlight pole and a metal fence at the same time. The streetlight pole was connected to the equipment ground of the power system supplying the streetlight. The metal fence was driven into the ground, but not bonded to the power system supplying the streetlight. At just the tine the child touched both the streetlight pole and the fence, a ground fault occurred in a 12 KV feeder several miles away The massive current flow before the overcurrent devices shut down the feeder raided the equipment ground above Earth ground by about 1000 volts. So a potential difference of about 1000 volts existed between the power pole and the fence connected to the earth. Enough current flowed to kill the child.

If the fence had been bonded to the streetlight pole equipment ground, there would have been no voltage between these items.

The entire purpose of the equipment ground is to prevent voltage differences between different grounded items. For it to function correctly, no current must be allowed to flow through the equipment ground unless a ground fault occurs.

-

-
 
  • Like
Likes Russell Ensslin
  • #43
I thought the purpose of the effective growing fault current path was to allow the short to cause the over-current device to trip the circuit.
I suppose it would also keep the majority of the current to flow to the easiest path back to the source which would cause an imbalance from some less effective path and the moats effective path and ZAP! The child is dead. :-(

Is that what happened?
 
  • #44
There is one purpose for the grounding system and another purpose for the bonding system.

The equipment ground is there to cause the overcurrent device to trip. It does trip, but it takes time for this to happen. During this brief time, the equipment ground of part of the system is not at ground potential.

Bonding metal objects to the equipment ground makes sure that the electrical potential of every metal or conductive object in the area is at the same potential, relative to each other. Even if the ground potential as a whole changes, all of the metal objects change by the same amount. You can safely touch any two bonded objects at the same time without receiving a shock.
 
  • #45
Thank you midiMag;
I thought that the equipment grounding was the bonding to the ground fault current path to trip the breaker.
 
  • #46
Russell Ensslin said:
I thought that the equipment grounding was the bonding to the ground fault current path to trip the breaker.

Yes, that's the purpose :smile:
 
Back
Top