Basic physics – mechanics (it is not homework)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on analyzing the mechanics of a flea's jump, as detailed in a physics textbook example. The calculations show that during the push-off phase, the flea experiences an acceleration approximately 100 times that of gravity, resulting in a very short upward distance. However, the observed jump height is less than predicted, prompting questions about the factors affecting the flea's actual performance. Participants suggest considering real-world physical factors, such as air resistance and energy loss, that are not accounted for in the idealized mathematical model. Understanding these factors is crucial for accurately interpreting the flea's jumping mechanics.
optics.tech
Messages
79
Reaction score
1
Hi everyone,

I would like to ask somebody here that could better understand than me of the following example from a book Physics – Principles with Applications, 3rd ed. by Douglas C. Giancoli, Prentice Hall, page 33. Here is the example http://img231.imageshack.us/img231/8103/fleajb0.jpg"

Example 2-12
The jump of a flea can be analyzed using slow-motion photography. The motion can be separated into two parts. The first is the “push off,” lasting about 10-3 second, during which the flea’s legs push against the ground and accelerate it to a speed of about 1.0 m/s. The second part is the flight of the flea into the air subject only to gravity http://img231.imageshack.us/img231/8103/fleajb0.jpg" Calculate:

(a) the acceleration of the flea during push off expressed as a multiple of g, the acceleration of gravity;
(b) the distance above the ground the flea reaches during push off; and
(c) the height the flea should reach during the second period when its acceleration is that of gravity. Assume the jump is vertical.

Solution:
Let us take the upward direction as positive, with y0 = 0.

(a) During the push off, the acceleration is

a = \frac{v - v_{0}}{t} = \frac{1.0 \ m/s - 0}{10^{-3} \ s} = 1000 \ m/s^2.

The magnitude of the acceleration is (1000 m/s2)/(9.80 m/s2) \approx 100 times the acceleration of gravity. Thus a \approx 100 g.

(b) We use equation x = x_{0} + V_{0}t + \frac{1}{2}at^2 , replacing x with y:

y = \frac{1}{2}at^{2} = 0.5(10^{3} \ m/s^{2})(10^{-3} \ s)^{2}<br /> = 0.5 * 10^{-3} \ m = 0.05 \ cm

(c) Now the acceleration is solely due to gravity, so a = -9.80 m/s2 and the initial velocity for this second period is 1.0 m/s. We use equation v^{2} = v_{0}^{2} + 2a(x - x_{0}), with v = 0 (we are considering the highest point):

y = \frac{v^{2} - v_{0}^{2}}{2a} = \frac{0 - (1.0 \ m/s)^{2}}{2(-9.80 \ m/s^{2})} = 0.05 \ m = 5 \ cm.

Photographs indicate that the flea jumps only about two-thirds this high. Can you guess why our calculation is off?

All of the example and solutions was just mentioned above. So can anyone tell me what the author means by the “calculation is off”? This problem is so difficult for me and makes me can’t do the exercise in this chapter. I need to understand this example of problem first.

Thank you very much on your help for this
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
optics.tech said:
All of the example and solutions was just mentioned above. So can anyone tell me what the author means by the “calculation is off”? This problem is so difficult for me and makes me can’t do the exercise in this chapter. I need to understand this example of problem first.

Thank you very much on your help for this
Can you think of any factors the would have affected the height of the flea's jump and which you didn't take into account?
 
Can you think of any factors that would have affected the height of the flea's jump and which you didn't take into account?

Hi Hootenanny,

Thank you for your reply.

I am sorry but…..

I really don’t know which factor is it!

All of the factor

v_{0}, v, a / g, y_{0}, y

is already known and obtained unless its time or

t.
 
Don't consider mathematical factors, consider physical factors. Remember that the mathematics is only a model, and the flea is in the real world.
 
As Varnick has already said, you should be looking at physical factors. For example, are there any forces that would act on the flea in real life that your model hasn't taken into account?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top