Basic question about Laplace and signals properties

AI Thread Summary
A Butterworth high-pass filter's temporal response equation was derived as y(t)=√2 e^(-31100t) *cos(31000t+π/4)u(t). The user is tasked with finding the output equation for a constant 1V signal from 0 to 0.5ms, transitioning to 0V from 0.5 to 1ms. They struggled with the simulation results in MATLAB, which indicated a response to the voltage transition. A solution was found using the superposition principle, involving the subtraction of two step functions to create a pulse for the first 0.0005 seconds. This approach allows for the correct representation of the output in the time domain.
tamtam402
Messages
199
Reaction score
0
Hey guys, I have a butterworth high-pass filter, and I was asked to find it's temporal response equation to the u(t) function. That part was easy, using basic Laplace tables I was able to find the following equation:
y(t)=√2 e^(-31100t) *cos⁡(31000t+π/4)u(t)
However, I'm supposed to be able to use that result to find the output equation (in the time domain) for a constant signal of magnitude 1V from 0 to 0.5ms, and 0V from 0.5 to 1ms. I'm at a loss here, because when using simulink (in Matlab) to simulate the response, I see that the output "responds" to the 1V to 0V transition. That means I can't simply use my equation with u(t) = 1 for t = 0 to 0.5ms, and u(t) = 0 for t = 0.5 to 1ms. What am I supposed to do?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
I would help you, but I'm signed up to take my first signals class next quarter!

Sorry!

Doesn't time domain mean just convert it from phasors to regular coordinates? but you already have it in terms of t so yah I wouldn't be able to help you yet :|
 
Ok I found out how to solve the problem. Using the superposition principle, substract 2 step functions to generate a pulse only for the first 0.0005 seconds. Do the same thing on the output.
 
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Hello dear reader, a brief introduction: Some 4 years ago someone started developing health related issues, apparently due to exposure to RF & ELF related frequencies and/or fields (Magnetic). This is currently becoming known as EHS. (Electromagnetic hypersensitivity is a claimed sensitivity to electromagnetic fields, to which adverse symptoms are attributed.) She experiences a deep burning sensation throughout her entire body, leaving her in pain and exhausted after a pulse has occurred...

Similar threads

Replies
31
Views
11K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
34
Views
12K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Back
Top