Basic question about spacetime and matter

AI Thread Summary
Space-time serves as the framework within which matter exists, but it is not synonymous with the matter itself. In special relativity, space-time is a static background for matter, while in general relativity, it becomes dynamic and influenced by the presence of matter. Matter is not considered a part of space-time; rather, it exists within it and affects its curvature. The relationship between matter and space-time is akin to how electromagnetic fields respond to charges. Understanding this distinction is crucial for grasping the nature of physics in both special and general relativity.
Watari
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
I'm trying to understand the concepts of physics, but there's one thing I don't fully get...
If there is some matter with a spatial and temporal coordinate, let's say coordinate X, is the matter "in" that time and place, or "is" the matter that time and place?
In other words, does space-time refer to the medium in which matter exists, or does it refer to the matter itself that exists there and then? Is matter part of space-time or is it something separate that is inside space-time?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
In special relativity, space-time is the background in which matter exists. In general relativity, it is no longer simply a background, but is also affected by the presence of matter. This does not mean that it is the matter, just that it is affected by it just as electromagnetic fields are influenced by the presence of charges.
 

Thread 'Potential biosignature found in Mars rock'

Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
View full post »

Thread 'Does it make sense to build new radio telescopes?'

TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
View full post »
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'

Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'

This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
View full post »

Similar threads

A Dark matter and spacetime metric
Replies
8
Views
4K
B Questions about space and matter
Replies
34
Views
2K
Question on possible dark matter classification
Replies
9
Views
2K
B Question regarding supermassive black holes in the early Universe
Replies
1
Views
2K
Naive Question about Dark Matter
Replies
20
Views
4K
B Question about time and its relation to spacetime
Replies
9
Views
28K
Space-Time & Matter: Explaining the Difference
Replies
2
Views
3K
B Does Spacetime Have Physical Existence?
2
Replies
58
Views
3K
I How Does Mass Influence Spacetime Curvature?
Replies
13
Views
2K
Speed of light in a dark matter medium
Replies
7
Views
4K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top