Basketball Rules: When Does a Ball Come to Rest?

  • Thread starter Thread starter bigseths
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Basketball
AI Thread Summary
In basketball officiating, a key rule states that a dribbler cannot have the ball come to rest in their hand, which constitutes a violation. The discussion revolves around whether the ball is considered "at rest" when it is pushed back to the ground or when it briefly pauses after bouncing off the backboard. Definitions of "at rest" vary; if it means zero velocity at any moment, then the ball does come to rest, but if it refers to a measurable time interval, it does not. The consensus suggests that while the ball can momentarily pause at the peak of a dribble, it cannot be held in that position. Understanding these nuances is crucial for accurate officiating in basketball.
bigseths
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hello all,

I officiate high school and college basketball. One of our rules concerning a dribble states that any time the ball comes to rest in a dribbler's hand, it is a violation. I won't concern you with all of the details of our argument, but I will pose a question that if answered like I believe it will be, will support my side.

When dribbling a basketball, or even slapping the ball down with your hand, does the ball come to rest everytime it is pushed back to the ground? However short a time it may be.

Or when a ball is shot and bounds off of the backboard, does the ball "come to rest" on the backboard before changing direction?

Thanks in advance for your responses, Seth Smiley
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It depends on how you define 'at rest'. If 'at rest' means the velocity of the ball is zero at any time then the answer is yes. If ' at rest' means the velocity is zero at a time interval (can be small but different from zero) then no.
 
just had a flash back

Wow I just had a flash back to my last physics class. Anyway, I'll bite. So you're telling me that the "time interval" when the ball has a velocity of zero cannot be measured?
 
I just took a scorekeeper's clinic last week where the officials were talking about this rule (it's CYO basketball, and we follow the standard high school rules). The ball will come to rest at the top of each dribble (vertical velocity goes to zero), and it can pause there briefly, but it cannot be held there with the hand supplying the upward force. Most of our kids don't have big enough hands to hold the ball in that position anyway. Palming the ball is a separate issue.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top