Batteries at freezing temperatures

AI Thread Summary
Developing a battery-operated invention for sub-freezing conditions presents challenges, particularly regarding battery performance at low temperatures. NiCd batteries function down to -40°C, but their legality in the EU is a concern, while NiMH and lead-acid batteries fail at -20°C. Lithium batteries are effective in cold conditions but are more expensive. A potential solution is to integrate a rechargeable battery into the product and source suitable batteries from an OEM, ensuring compatibility and brand recognition. Clear communication about battery requirements is essential for consumer understanding and safety.
alexwryt
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
I am trying to develop a battery operated invention that will be used primarily in sub freezing conditions. From what I can tell from my research so far, a simple 9 volt NiMH or lithium will work fine under these conditions. The only problem I foresee though is that when this was eventually a product out on the market, I doubt the general public as a whole would heed the package warning of only using NiMH or lithium batteries

As a workaround I've thought of integrating a rechargeable battery into the product itself but am unsure what type of battery would be ideal and also cheap. (Basically I'd like to be able to turn a DC motor with a small load for at least 2 hours)
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
NiCd work down to -40°C whereas NiMH, lead acid, LiO stop working at -20°C. NiCd can be recharged, but seems to become illegal now in the EU. Lithium stuff is expensive, but appearently can be made to work in the cold too.
 
You can always purchase the batteries that you feel would fit best in your device from an OEM. From there, put your companies name on it and add a little premium. Then, only support your device with those said batteries (but of course let your battery chemistry be known)...
 
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Hello dear reader, a brief introduction: Some 4 years ago someone started developing health related issues, apparently due to exposure to RF & ELF related frequencies and/or fields (Magnetic). This is currently becoming known as EHS. (Electromagnetic hypersensitivity is a claimed sensitivity to electromagnetic fields, to which adverse symptoms are attributed.) She experiences a deep burning sensation throughout her entire body, leaving her in pain and exhausted after a pulse has occurred...
Back
Top