Battery that stays charged for 30 years.

AI Thread Summary
A new type of battery utilizing radioisotopes could potentially last for 30 years without needing a recharge, primarily powered by the decay of radioactive materials. While such batteries are already in use for space probes and remote stations, their low power output limits broader applications. Technologies like SNAP generators and semiconductor-based nuclear batteries have been explored, but issues such as damage to semiconductor materials from energetic particles pose significant challenges. Concerns about safety and the practicality of using these batteries in everyday devices, like laptops, are also raised. Overall, while the concept shows promise, further advancements are necessary for practical public use.
blimkie.k
Messages
130
Reaction score
0
I "stumbledupon" this article this morning.

A battery that used radioisotopes and is powered by the decay of the radioactive material. Sounds like it would work. Is this legit? If so it seems like a pretty serious innovation. I'm sure this battery if developed for the public would have a lot more use then just laptops.

http://www.stumbleupon.com/su/1PJfLa/www.dodevice.com/2007/10/02/one-laptop-battery-that-lasts-30-years-without-recharge/
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Yes they exist - they are used to power some space probes and used to be used for remote navigational/weather stations
They have very low power for their size and weight.
 
I've known of three technologies for generating electricity directly from nuclear decay. Back in the late 50's or early 60's, the SNAP generators were developed. They used the heat from the decay to heat one side of a thermo-electric module/modules which in turn produced electricity.

The Soviets had a technology using the decay to heat a column in a kind of vacuum tube such that thermo electric emmission delivered current.

Then, there is the holy grail of nuclear batteries which uses semiconductors (like solar cells) to capture energy directly from particles emitted by the nuclear decay. This sounds like the proposed technology. It has suffered a major setback though - the energetic particles damage the semiconductor crystal causing it to loose performance after a short while.
 
Though i didn't want one of those in my lap one hour a day. Or are the beta rays sufficent shielded?

Anyone know the Wh/kg ratio on these?
 
As I remember from Physics, Beta Rays are simply electrons which may be moving really fast. They don't have much in the way of penetrating power and find a sheet of paper (?) a challenge.
I suspect that in the process of being blocked, they produce soft x-rays, which in turn are easily blocked.

As for Wh/kg, I'm pretty sure that's determined by something other than the fuel :)
 
Very basic question. Consider a 3-terminal device with terminals say A,B,C. Kirchhoff Current Law (KCL) and Kirchhoff Voltage Law (KVL) establish two relationships between the 3 currents entering the terminals and the 3 terminal's voltage pairs respectively. So we have 2 equations in 6 unknowns. To proceed further we need two more (independent) equations in order to solve the circuit the 3-terminal device is connected to (basically one treats such a device as an unbalanced two-port...
suppose you have two capacitors with a 0.1 Farad value and 12 VDC rating. label these as A and B. label the terminals of each as 1 and 2. you also have a voltmeter with a 40 volt linear range for DC. you also have a 9 volt DC power supply fed by mains. you charge each capacitor to 9 volts with terminal 1 being - (negative) and terminal 2 being + (positive). you connect the voltmeter to terminal A2 and to terminal B1. does it read any voltage? can - of one capacitor discharge + of the...
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Back
Top