Battle of Hastings - October 14, 1066

  • Thread starter Thread starter Astronuc
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the historical context of the Battle of Hastings, which took place on October 14, 1066, marking a significant moment in English history. William of Normandy landed in England to claim the crown, and after defeating King Harold II, who had just triumphed over a Norwegian invasion, William established Norman rule. The composition of Harold's army, hastily gathered and fatigued from previous battles, raised questions about the willingness and effectiveness of such a force. Despite their initial resolve, the army's discipline faltered during the battle. Harold's unexpected death, caused by an arrow, was a pivotal moment that ultimately led to William's victory, underscoring the unpredictable nature of warfare and the consequences of leadership decisions. The discussion highlights the complexities of medieval military dynamics and the impact of individual actions on historical outcomes.
Astronuc
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
22,344
Reaction score
7,155
Another 61 years and it will be the 1000th anniversary.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Hastings
On September 28, 1066, William of Normandy, bent on asserting by arms his claim to the English crown, landed unopposed at Pevensey. Upon setting foot on the beach, William tripped and fell on his face. Saving face, he rose, grabbing handfuls of sand and shouted "I now take hold of the land of England!" On hearing the news, the Saxon King Harold, who had just destroyed the Norwegian army under King Harald Hardråda at the Battle of Stamford Bridge in Yorkshire, hurried southward, gathering what forces he could on the way.

On the morning of Saturday, October 14, Duke William gathered his army below the English position. The Norman army was of comparable size to the English force, and composed of William's Norman, Breton and Flemish vassals along with various Norman nobles and their retainers. The nobles had been promised English lands and titles in return for their material support. The army was deployed in the classic medieval fashion with the Normans taking the centre, the Bretons on the left wing and the Flemish on right wing. Each battle comprised infantry, cavalry and archers along with crossbowmen. The archers and crossbowmen stood to the front for the start of the battle.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/history/war/normans/hastings_01.shtml

http://www.fordham.edu/halsall/source/1066malmesbury.html

http://www.regia.org/hastings.htm
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Did the people that composed Harolds army go into battle willingly? and how
effective is a part time army gathered in haste ?
 
wolram said:
Did the people that composed Harolds army go into battle willingly? and how
effective is a part time army gathered in haste ?

Harold has raised his army, by the usual methods of Anglo-Saxon culture, which means that at least the leaders were willing, in order to fight off the other invasion, by Harald Hardraade of Norway. He defeated that invader in the North of England, and then heard about William's invasion, so he marched the army South to Senlac ("Hastings"). The army was pretty frazzled and fractious by that time, which showed in some failures of discpline during the battle. But it was by no means foreordained that Wiliam would win. If Harold hadn't been killed by an arrow that struck him through the eye-slit of his helmet - a complete fluke - the battle could have gone either way.
 
selfAdjoint said:
Harold has raised his army, by the usual methods of Anglo-Saxon culture, which means that at least the leaders were willing, in order to fight off the other invasion, by Harald Hardraade of Norway. He defeated that invader in the North of England,
Only because Harald had only a fraction of his army with him when he spotted Harold's army.
The dumb Norwegian thought he would dishonour himself if he made a hasty retreat to his main forces and gave the signal for a suicidal assault instead..
 
https://www.newsweek.com/robert-redford-dead-hollywood-live-updates-2130559 Apparently Redford was a somewhat poor student, so was headed to Europe to study art and painting, but stopped in New York and studied acting. Notable movies include Barefoot in the Park (1967 with Jane Fonda), Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid (1969, with Paul Newma), Jeremiah Johnson, the political drama The Candidate (both 1972), The Sting (1973 with Paul Newman), the romantic dramas The Way We Were (1973), and...

Similar threads

Back
Top