Bead on the uniformly rotating wire

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the dynamics of a bead sliding on a uniformly rotating, frictionless wire in free space, as described in Goldstein's classical mechanics book. The bead experiences outward motion due to centripetal acceleration, leading to confusion about why it is termed centripetal rather than centrifugal. Centripetal force is defined as the force directed towards the center of the circular path, while centrifugal force is perceived as an outward force experienced by an observer, such as the tension felt in a string when swinging an object. The distinction between these forces is clarified, emphasizing that centripetal force acts on the object in motion, whereas centrifugal force is a reaction felt by an external observer. This explanation aims to clarify the concepts of centripetal and centrifugal forces in circular motion.
prashantphy
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
"bead sliding on the uniformly rotating frictionless wire in free space" is the standard problem solved in Goldstein's classical mechanics book. The bead moves in outward direction (a=rω2) still why it is called as centripetal acceleration and not centrifugal?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
no answer in one month ?
 
I am not familiar with you reference book.
What I can say is that centripetal force is the resultant force towards the centre of a circle ON the object in circular motion.
Centrifugal force is an outwards force and as an example: a stone on a string being swung in a circle, I would say the centrifugal force is the outwards force experienced by the hand at the other end of the string to the stone. It is the outwards force experienced by the person holding the string.
This is probably not a rigorous definition but I hope that it is good enough to provide food for thought !
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Let there be a person in a not yet optimally designed sled at h meters in height. Let this sled free fall but user can steer by tilting their body weight in the sled or by optimal sled shape design point it in some horizontal direction where it is wanted to go - in any horizontal direction but once picked fixed. How to calculate horizontal distance d achievable as function of height h. Thus what is f(h) = d. Put another way, imagine a helicopter rises to a height h, but then shuts off all...
Back
Top