Beam bending and moment of inertia

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the calculation of the first moment of area and moment of inertia for two beams placed on top of each other in a three-point bending scenario. The context includes theoretical considerations and practical applications related to beam mechanics.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant asks how to find the first moment of area and moment of inertia for two beams stacked on top of each other in a simply supported configuration.
  • Another participant suggests using the parallel axis theorem if the beams are assumed to always stay in contact.
  • A different participant clarifies that if the beams are independent and there is no transverse shear, the parallel axis theorem may not apply to the beams as a set, and the load can be split evenly between them.
  • One participant argues that to find the area moment of inertia of the composite section, the parallel axis theorem should still be used, taking the interface as the neutral axis and calculating the overall moment of inertia from the individual beams' moments.
  • There is a reiteration that the moment of inertia can be considered as two times the individual moments if the beams act independently.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the applicability of the parallel axis theorem in this scenario, indicating that there is no consensus on how to approach the calculation of the moment of inertia for the two beams.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the importance of assumptions regarding shear and independence of the beams, which may affect the calculations and the application of the parallel axis theorem.

ttlg
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
If you have two beams, not attatched to each other, placed on top of each other in 3 point bending simply supported, what do you do to find the first moment of area and moment inertia of the two beams.
Thanks
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Hi Fred,
I think what ttlg is asking is if the two beams are simply sitting on top of each other such that there can be no transverse shear between the two (like a leaf spring on a car). The two beams, stacked one on top of the other, are then simply supported at the ends and loaded in the center with a vertical force. In that case, since there's no transverse shear between the two (ie: the beams act independantly) the parallel axis theorem doesn't apply to the beams as a set. In this case, the load acting on the beams can simply be split 50/50 between the two beams (each beam supports 1/2 the load).
 
Q,
The loads can be split the way you mention, but to find the area MOI of the assembly, i.e. the composite section, one needs to use the parallel axis theorem. I am using the interface between the two beams as the neutral axis (with no shear between the two as you mentioned). From there take the two individual beams' respective area MOIs and use the parallel axis theorem to calculate the overall area MOI.
 
ok, thanks for your help
 
FredGarvin said:
Q,
The loads can be split the way you mention, but to find the area MOI of the assembly, i.e. the composite section, one needs to use the parallel axis theorem. I am using the interface between the two beams as the neutral axis (with no shear between the two as you mentioned). From there take the two individual beams' respective area MOIs and use the parallel axis theorem to calculate the overall area MOI.

QGoest said:
since there's no transverse shear between the two (ie: the beams act independantly) the parallel axis theorem doesn't apply to the beams as a set.

Looking at Q's comments about the shear stress...he's right on that. The MOI is simply two times the individual MOIs.
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K