Behind the border off the universe

  • Thread starter Thread starter rudeonline
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Universe
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a personal theory challenging established concepts in physics, particularly relativity. The idea posits that if the speed of light is considered zero, then consciousness defines the boundaries of the universe, suggesting that time may not exist. The author attempts to connect awareness with light, proposing that we move through time at the speed of light, leading to a notion of timelessness. The conversation touches on the implications of acceleration and the perception of time near light speed, ultimately blending physics with philosophical ideas. The moderator advises that such unconventional theories should be discussed in the Independent Research Forum instead.
rudeonline
Messages
35
Reaction score
0
If general physics not will do, I tell my you my idea here..

Moderator Edit

Dear PF member,

This post has been edited because it contains opinions that are contrary to those currently held by the scientific community. This is against the Posting Guidelines of Physics Forums. If you would like to discuss your ideas, we invite you to submit a post to the Independent Research Forum, subject to the applicable guidelines, found https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=82301.

We appreciate your cooperation, and hope you enjoy the Forums.



Tom Mattson
[/color]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Space news on Phys.org
rudeonline said:
If general physics not will do, I tell my you my idea here..

I would like to tell you my idea about the relativity theory. Scientist should put the theory upsite down so that the lightspeed is zero and that we are moving tru time with the speed off light. Our own conciousness is the real border off the universe sipmly by the fact that tommerow does not exist yet. Light is like a trail what stands still while we are moving tru time. I can prove the stilness off light with 2 pieces off rope. The simple fact is, that if time stands still at lightspeed, there is nog possobility off movement at all.

I would say that litespeed should be the 'zero point'

...since its the fastest thing there is...then it should become ZERO.

Everything should be measured in relation to this zero...

I have been trying to connect 'Awareness' and the speed of lite for sometime...but have not been successful. :frown:

...I will continue the thought experiments :devil:
 
If 'awareness' and light are one and the same...then time may not exsist
at all...

This borders on Mytical...but I think I can get away with it down here in the philosophy section...




PS:Did U factor in the time it would take to accellarate to 80% of litespeed?...it may take several yrs
 
Last edited:
eggman said:
If 'awareness' and light are one and the same...then time may not exsist
at all...

This borders on Mytical...but I think I can get away with it down here in the philosophy section...




PS:Did U factor in the time it would take to accellarate to 80% of litespeed?...it may take several yrs

I try to explain that we are moving with lightspeed tru time. The accelaration to get there is not a big problem. If an object falls with 10km/sec2 it will take only a few day's to reach te speed of light ( sory that I can not tell you exactly how much time, a person good in math could help me with this). The object itself will thing it is weightless. Try to sea Earth as a big falling object in space, light is just leaving us as a trail.
 
if we r moving with litespeed thru time...then we are time itself...

which in turn becomes timelessness

it cancels itself...

physics falls head first into the void of philosophy...
 
i read if u were to walk off into a black hole and i were to watch u do this...u would appear to stop...but from u'r end u would have fallen into the black hole...

Time/Gravity and Light seem to be tricksters of the brain...

All I can understand is the closer a body comes to lite speed...time comes to a stop

I have yet to understand all the details...about gravity and what not..
 
Last edited:
You should try Indpendent reserach instead of philosphy
 
rudeonline said:
If general physics not will do, I tell my you my idea here..

No you won't.
 
Back
Top