I Bell measurement of distant particles

Heidi
Messages
420
Reaction score
40
Hi Pf
I am looking at the figure in wiki about quantum teleportation.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Quantum_teleportation_diagram.PNG
A wants to send a qubit to B . She receives another qubit from a spdc.
so she has to make a Bell measurement on them. Has these qbits to be close in space and time to do that?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Heidi said:
Hi Pf
I am looking at the figure in wiki about quantum teleportation.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Quantum_teleportation_diagram.PNG
A wants to send a qubit to B . She receives another qubit from a spdc.
so she has to make a Bell measurement on them. Has these qbits to be close in space and time to do that?

In the diagram you reference: No, A and B can be as far apart as you like. However, a classical signal must go from A to B so that a determination can be made as to the proper operation(s) to execute so that the exiting photon is a proper clone of the original.
 
I am afraid i misspoke my question. it is only about the two photons that Alice has. at t she receives a photon from the spdc but what about the other photon (the ϕ)
What if she receives it at a time t0 before or after t?
can a bell measurement be done with distant qubits at t?
 
Last edited:
Heidi said:
I am afraid i misspoke my question. it is only about the two photons that Alice has. at t she receives a photon from the spdc but what about the other photon (the ϕ)
What if she receives it at a time t0 before or after t?
can a bell measurement be done with distant qubits at t?

No. To do a Bell State Measurement (BSM), the 2 particles must arrive at nearly the same time - so as to be indistinguishable. They are routed into a PBS apparatus together, and then you look for a pair of detections at the output ports.

As a general rule, PDC pairs cannot be produced upon demand. So in many (most) cases, the photons being subjected to the BSM will not arrive together within a small enough time window.
 
  • Like
Likes Heidi
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top