Bending of Light around a Star

kmarinas86
Messages
974
Reaction score
1
I know that the formula for the angle of bending of light around the star \theta \; in radians is:

\theta \; = \frac{4GM}{rc^2}

This is equal to full bending of light, half of which occurs on the rear side of the star and the other half occurring on the foreground side.

So half of this is equal to:

\frac{\theta \;}{2} = \frac{2GM}{rc^2}

So that:

dt = \frac{d\tau \;}{\sqrt{1-\frac{\theta\;}{2}}}

\sqrt{1-\frac{\theta \;}{2}} = \frac{d\tau\;}{dt}

1-\frac{\theta \;}{2} = \frac{d\tau\;^2}{dt^2}

1-\frac{d\tau \;^2}{dt^2} = \frac{\theta\;}{2}

2 \left( 1-\frac{d\tau \;^2}{dt^2} \right) = \theta\;

If \theta \;=2 radians then there would be infinite gravitational time dilation.

Did I get that right?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm not sure about your notation. Also, the formula is only valid for small angles.

My text gives the angle of deflection (converting to non-geometric units) as

\Theta = \frac{4GM}{c^2b}

where b is the impact parameter, related to the Schwarzschild radius of the 'turning point" r_{tp} by

<br /> b = \frac{r_{tp}}{\sqrt{1-\frac{2GM}{r_{tp}c^2}}}<br />

This is only a small-angle approximation, the results won't be right for \Theta = 2\pi.

A photon that gets deflected by a black hole will always be outside the photon sphere at r=3GM/c^2, so the maximum time dilation at closest approach for the actual orbit will always be finite - less than \sqrt{3}.

[add]I've attached a numeric solution for a photon starting out just outside the photon radius at r_min=3.01, spiraling outwards. The mass M of the black hole is 1 in geometric units.

The appropriate differential equation used to generate it which describes the exact orbit of a photon around a Schwarzschild black hole is , using geometric units in which G=c=1:

<br /> \left( \frac{1}{r^2} \frac{d r}{d \theta} \right) ^2 + \frac{1-2M/r}{r^2} = \frac{1}{b^2} = \frac{1-2M/r_{min}}{r_{min}^2}<br />
 

Attachments

  • phot.jpg
    phot.jpg
    7.1 KB · Views: 510
Last edited:
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
190
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
26
Views
1K
Replies
28
Views
2K
Back
Top